Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Minirosetta 1.95
Author | Message |
---|---|
mtyka Volunteer moderator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 19 Mar 08 Posts: 79 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Please post your bug reports here! Thank you ! |
AdeB Send message Joined: 22 Dec 07 Posts: 61 Credit: 161,367 RAC: 0 |
|
I _ quit Send message Joined: 13 Jan 09 Posts: 44 Credit: 88,562 RAC: 0 |
ran ok, but validate errors: https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=1579165 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=1579162 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=1579146 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=1579140 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=1579139 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=1578704 |
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 912 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
https://ralph.bakerlab.org/workunit.php?wuid=1397739 I kill this wu (and other 5), because after 36 minutes it's at 0% (initializing).... Use of ram? Over 500 mb!! |
Snagletooth Send message Joined: 4 May 07 Posts: 67 Credit: 134,427 RAC: 0 |
242l_A_50_I_ddg_predictions_82409_001_MUT.242l_A_50_I_.out_12117_1_0 According to the information in the graphics window this one was still initializing after 52 minutes. A minute or so after I closed the window it uploaded and now reports that it has completed one decoy successfully. As my target runtime is 4 hours I suspect that it is not simply a matter of an error in the graphics. The question then is would it be just as well to abort WUs that don't initialize within x minutes and report them here as stefanob has done or is there valuable information in the 4.41MB upload that would be lost if the WU is not allowed to end on its own? Snags |
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 912 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
I kill the wu because i cannot work with my pc (over 1Gb of ram....)!!! I think that debug is important, but this is too much for my poor notebook I return to rosetta 1.97 (90 mb at WU) |
AdeB Send message Joined: 22 Dec 07 Posts: 61 Credit: 161,367 RAC: 0 |
I had to kill this task. It made other applications crash and claimed almost all of the memory (including virtual memory). AdeB |
Nflight Send message Joined: 1 Nov 07 Posts: 5 Credit: 36,103 RAC: 0 |
Work Unit: 1aye D 35 a ddg predictions 82009 003 MUT D 35 A .out 12105 1 1 Taking up 563 K of Ram Now going on 16 hours. Now ending, locking up my system time to time! Work Unit 1395454 |
Snagletooth Send message Joined: 4 May 07 Posts: 67 Credit: 134,427 RAC: 0 |
238l_A_103_V_ddg_predictions_82409_010_MUT.238l_A_103_V_.out_12126_1_0 Another one. I was away from the computer while this one ran but it ended itself in less than an hour with the same report as the last WU. I'm sorry I wasn't around to take note of the amount of memory it claimed. Obviously if it's taking up all the computer's memory it's going to get killed by the cruncher. Has anyone tried quitting(not suspending) BOINC (or even just that task) thus removing it from memory then restarting? I wonder if it would error out immediately on restart and further if that error report would contain anything more useful than a simple abort. I vaguely recall the project adding code to end those WUs that never seem to start and assume that's catching mine though I see nothing obvious in the sterr out unless the clue is this line: reached end of minirosetta::main(). I further assume that claiming one decoy is just to give me some credit without having to run a special validator script. If my assumptions are correct the question of most interest though would be, Why did my WUs end gracefully but Nflight's run on for 16 hours? Snags |
RodEllery Send message Joined: 20 Feb 06 Posts: 5 Credit: 8,820 RAC: 0 |
|
Snagletooth Send message Joined: 4 May 07 Posts: 67 Credit: 134,427 RAC: 0 |
theta_PCS_BOINC_abrelax.1xcycles.v1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_12132_2_0 21 decoys completed but output file absent: Thu Aug 27 00:03:14 2009|ralph@home|Computation for task theta_PCS_BOINC_abrelax.1xcycles.v1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_12132_2_0 finished Thu Aug 27 00:03:14 2009|ralph@home|Output file theta_PCS_BOINC_abrelax.1xcycles.v1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_12132_2_0_0 for task theta_PCS_BOINC_abrelax.1xcycles.v1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_12132_2_0 absent stderr out: ====================================================== DONE :: 21 starting structures 13985.5 cpu seconds This process generated 21 decoys from 21 attempts ====================================================== BOINC :: Watchdog shutting down... BOINC :: BOINC support services shutting down cleanly ... called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> <message> <file_xfer_error> <file_name>theta_PCS_BOINC_abrelax.1xcycles.v1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_12132_2_0_0</file_name> <error_code>-161</error_code> </file_xfer_error> |
Conan Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 364 Credit: 1,368,421 RAC: 0 |
|
himmelskasper Send message Joined: 24 May 09 Posts: 1 Credit: 2,638 RAC: 0 |
mmhm, i have permanent calculation faults (@40%) :( ...what is the problem?...cu hK |
Snagletooth Send message Joined: 4 May 07 Posts: 67 Credit: 134,427 RAC: 0 |
|
BigMike Send message Joined: 23 Feb 06 Posts: 63 Credit: 58,730 RAC: 0 |
This one only ran for a few seconds: Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) ERROR: ERROR: Unable to open silent_input file: 'default.out' ERROR:: Exit from: ....srccoreiosilentSilentFileData.cc line: 96 BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out ==Mike Don't believe everything you think. |
I _ quit Send message Joined: 13 Jan 09 Posts: 44 Credit: 88,562 RAC: 0 |
4 x the same error: ERROR: ERROR: Unable to open silent_input file: 'default.out' ERROR:: Exit from: ....srccoreiosilentSilentFileData.cc line: 96 BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out called boinc_finish https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=1583639 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=1583638 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=1583662 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=1583661 happens between 5-9 seconds into the task |
svincent Send message Joined: 4 Apr 08 Posts: 34 Credit: 51,768 RAC: 0 |
I'm getting Ralph workunits for 1.95 while Rosetta is at 1.97. How come? |
Path7 Send message Joined: 11 Feb 08 Posts: 56 Credit: 4,974 RAC: 0 |
I'm getting Ralph workunits for 1.95 while Rosetta is at 1.97. How come? Good question. Looks like a (quick-)fix to me at Rosetta@home. Perhaps the techs would like to answer the question why Ralph is still at minirosetta 1.95? And an error: proteinG_PCS_BOINC_abrelax.1xcycles.v1_NOGZ_SAVE_ALL_OUT_12136_6_1 ERROR: ERROR: Unable to open silent_input file: 'default.out' ERROR:: Exit from: ....srccoreiosilentSilentFileData.cc line: 96 BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out called boinc_finish Had the second run of this WU, the first run it had the same error. Have a nice day, Path7. |
svincent Send message Joined: 4 Apr 08 Posts: 34 Credit: 51,768 RAC: 0 |
This 1585116 on Mac sat for over an hour apparently initialising ( 0% progress : model 0 step 0) yet it completed OK. I used the Sampler to get a dump of what it was doing while initialising: it's way too big to post here but will Email it if it's of interest. I've had the same issue with a few recent Rosetta@home workunits. |
Murasaki Send message Joined: 1 Aug 09 Posts: 7 Credit: 2,202 RAC: 0 |
Task 1585136 myoglobin_PCS_BOINC_abrelax.1xcycles.v1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_12132_13_1 ====================================================== An earlier attempt to crunch this WU by another user resulted in the same xfer error. |
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Minirosetta 1.95
©2024 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org