Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : minirosetta 2.17
Author | Message |
---|---|
Yifan Song Send message Joined: 18 May 09 Posts: 13 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
This update fixes the memory and invalidation issues from 2 weeks ago. please report bugs here. |
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 912 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
A lot of wu and no one error. It seems to be a good wu version.... |
Ironworker16 Send message Joined: 17 Nov 09 Posts: 3 Credit: 41,840 RAC: 0 |
I have some run times over 40 hrs with one work unit at 38% 2 at 7% and 2 at less than 1%. Should I let them continue to run? No matter what the response I receive they will continue to run until I get home tomorrow evening. |
I _ quit Send message Joined: 13 Jan 09 Posts: 44 Credit: 88,562 RAC: 0 |
this task Task ID 1976261 Name T0591_AF_rs_stg0_lrlxMultiCst_t000__casp9__aln1_SAVE_ALL_OUT_14996_3920_0 has an elapsed time of 24hrs 7 mins and still 8 hrs run time to go. 32hrs for a task? Preferences are set for 4hr run time not 32hrs. Will let it run, but there is something wrong with the task if it is fouling up Boinc Manager. |
Snagletooth Send message Joined: 4 May 07 Posts: 67 Credit: 134,427 RAC: 0 |
Remember that the elapsed time is wall clock time whereas the preference setting is for cpu time. Open the properties window for that particular task to see how much cpu time it has accumulated. greg_be, that task completed 4 models in 18418.4 cpu seconds so it appears to have honored your preference of 21600 cpu seconds. If the discrepancy between cpu and elapsed time is dramatically different from from what you are used to seeing then it might be wise to open up task manager (or whatever it's called in Windows) and make sure some new or errant process isn't eating up a bunch of cpu cycles. Best, Snags |
AdeB Send message Joined: 22 Dec 07 Posts: 61 Credit: 161,367 RAC: 0 |
Task: 1978682 Workunit: t591__boinc_rosetta_cm_loopbuild_threading_cst_relax_wangyr_IGNORE_THE_REST_15010_10 stderr out: ERROR: Option matching -relax:fastrelax_repeats not found in command line top-level context AdeB |
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 912 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
Same here on Windows 7: 1979016 1979017 1979018 1979019 1979020 <core_client_version>6.10.58</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Funzione non corretta. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> [2010-11- 4 20:26:26:] :: BOINC:: Initializing ... ok. [2010-11- 4 20:26:26:] :: BOINC :: boinc_init() BOINC:: Setting up shared resources ... ok. BOINC:: Setting up semaphores ... ok. BOINC:: Updating status ... ok. BOINC:: Registering timer callback... ok. BOINC:: Worker initialized successfully. Registering options.. Registered extra options. Initializing broker options ... Registered extra options. Initializing core... Initializing options.... ok Options::initialize() Options::adding_options() Options::initialize() Check specs. Options::initialize() End reached ERROR: Option matching -relax:fastrelax_repeats not found in command line top-level context |
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 912 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
New error 1980977 ERROR: Unable to open atomset file: workyfsongSVNminirosetta_databasechemical/atom_type_sets/fa_standard//atom_properties.txt ERROR:: Exit from: ....srccorechemicalAtomTypeSet.cc line: 73 BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out called boinc_finish |
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 912 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
Also with windows 7 64-bit, after few seconds: 1982643 1982730 |
Conan Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 364 Credit: 1,368,421 RAC: 0 |
I also get the same error on over 2 pages (40) of work units, all on 2 Windows machines (XP 32 bit). Linux not having the same problem. |
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 912 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
I also get the same error on over 2 pages (40) of work units, all on 2 Windows machines (XP 32 bit). Linux not having the same problem. So, it's a OS problem.... |
Evan Send message Joined: 23 Dec 07 Posts: 75 Credit: 69,584 RAC: 0 |
PCS_PGR122A_v1.frag_18-51_SAVE_ALL_OUT_15041_1_0 This one failed within a few seconds ERROR: First parameter of SVD_Solver constructor MUST be larger than the second parameter ERROR:: Exit from: ....srcnumericSVDSVD_Solver.cc line: 202 |
I _ quit Send message Joined: 13 Jan 09 Posts: 44 Credit: 88,562 RAC: 0 |
https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=1979778 ERROR: Unable to open atomset file: workyfsongSVNminirosetta_databasechemical/atom_type_sets/fa_standard//atom_properties.txt ERROR:: Exit from: ....srccorechemicalAtomTypeSet.cc line: 73 BOINC:: Error reading and gzipping output datafile: default.out called boinc_finish |
I _ quit Send message Joined: 13 Jan 09 Posts: 44 Credit: 88,562 RAC: 0 |
@Snags Changed a preference setting in BOINC. Was switching tasks every 60 mins changed that to every 4hrs to try and get tasks under control. Had 6-8 open in various stages at any one time under old setting. This could account for the bizarre clock time. |
Snagletooth Send message Joined: 4 May 07 Posts: 67 Credit: 134,427 RAC: 0 |
@Snags Hey, greg be - I would imagine that having fewer wus in a "waiting to run" status would lessen the reliance on a swap file and thus increase overall efficiency (assuming you've got "leave apps in memory" set to yes). Is that what you were going for? Have the times improved? Best, Snags |
feet1st Send message Joined: 7 Mar 06 Posts: 313 Credit: 116,623 RAC: 0 |
https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=1989563 ERROR: no convergence in svdcmp Only ran 44 seconds. |
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 912 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
Same here: 1989656 1989657 1989661 |
[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 912 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294 |
Same here: 1989660 |
John McLeod VII Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 8 Credit: 39,560 RAC: 0 |
Really long run time. It is currently at 75 hours and 0.266%. The machine is a Windows 7 machine based on a Core i7. What information do you need to help debug this problem. BOINC WIKI |
feet1st Send message Joined: 7 Mar 06 Posts: 313 Credit: 116,623 RAC: 0 |
What information do you need to help debug this problem. I would think they would at least like to know the task name. Was the 75hrs CPU time? Or "elapsed" time? Is the task manager showing it getting CPU? |
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
minirosetta 2.17
©2024 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org