Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Report - Previously Unclassified Work Unit Errors
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Astro Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 141 Credit: 32,977 RAC: 0 |
I went to my results and see several that "comp errored" out. Hmmm, Must have happened while I slept (strange, I don't remember sleeping that much, short nap here, short nap there, that's about it for me). LOL |
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
Access Violation - Rosetta_beta_4.89 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=10919 *pc undisturbed when this occured - I was out for about 1 hour ... *no one else has access to this pc Click signature for global team stats |
Nuadormrac Send message Joined: 22 Feb 06 Posts: 68 Credit: 11,362 RAC: 0 |
Maximum disk usage space exceeded error, in 4.89 result https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=10997 stderr out <core_client_version>5.2.13</core_client_version> <message>Maximum disk usage exceeded </message> <stderr_txt> # random seed: 3989828 # cpu_run_time_pref: 28800 Comp was running when I was in bed last night, and when I got up to do some things. Errored out when I was away from it. Computer behind locked door (in my apartment) and no one else has access... Only other thing going on, is I'm downloading a torrent via Azureus, albeit the download is being written to a seperate (external) hard drive, on a seperate controller (USB for the external drive, vs. a SCSI adapter for the system/BOINC drive), which neither BOINC, nor the operating system itself are installed on, or run from... Any files that are needed for this one? |
Marky-UK Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 5 Credit: 1,530 RAC: 0 |
WU 11498 failed after 44 seconds for me. It looks like it also failed after 83 seconds for someone else. <message>Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> |
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
Access Violation Rosetta_beta_4.89 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=12011 Previous to occurring that access violation ... Date Host Project ID Message 2/28/2006 9:01:40 AM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 21 Aborting result HOMSb7_homDB030_1b72__226_4_0: exceeded disk limit: 200022677.000000 > 200000000.000000 2/28/2006 9:01:40 AM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 22 Unrecoverable error for result HOMSb7_homDB030_1b72__226_4_0 (Maximum disk usage exceeded) 2/28/2006 9:01:41 AM carlos.cp3 --- 23 request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 2/28/2006 9:01:41 AM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 24 Computation for result HOMSb7_homDB030_1b72__226_4_0 finished 2/28/2006 9:01:41 AM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 25 Starting result HOMSb7_homDB001_1b72__226_5_0 using rosetta_beta version 489 2/28/2006 9:02:41 AM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 26 Sending scheduler request to https://ralph.bakerlab.org/ralph_cgi/cgi 2/28/2006 9:02:41 AM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 27 Reason: To report results 2/28/2006 9:02:41 AM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 28 Reporting 1 results 2/28/2006 9:03:02 AM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 29 Scheduler request to https://ralph.bakerlab.org/ralph_cgi/cgi succeeded I have more than 2 GB of free disk space and my preferences for disk usage are set high enough to support a GB result file Oh! ??? Why not finish the WU when it top on u size limits, instead of aborting it? Click signature for global team stats |
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
Exit status -1073741819 (0xffffffffc0000005) Rosetta_Beta_4.89 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=12012 I see in other threads that we are testing 4.90 !? Why I am not ??? This WU was sent me today and when I try refreshing the project I get Date Host Project ID Message 2/28/2006 10:12:29 AM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 81 No work from project Thus, I am assuming that there are only 4.89 WU s -- at least for me -:( Now Ill play a game - NO WUs to test -:( Click signature for global team stats |
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
stuck at 80.41% Rosetta_betta_4.84 Linux https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=13007 not using CPU -> load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.07 crobertp [/home/boinc/BOINC] > ps xu USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND boinc 27682 0.0 0.4 2616 1036 ? SN Feb17 0:00 /bin/bash ./yasuc.sh boinc 23482 0.0 1.5 5868 3740 ? S 05:58 0:02 ./boinc -redirectio -allow_remote_gui_rpc -return_results_imme boinc 23621 44.8 27.4 172164 68060 ? SN 06:35 108:08 rosetta_beta_4.84_i686-pc-linux-gnu xx 1dcj _ -abrelax -string boinc 23622 0.0 27.4 172164 68060 ? SN 06:35 0:00 rosetta_beta_4.84_i686-pc-linux-gnu xx 1dcj _ -abrelax -string boinc 23623 0.0 27.4 172164 68060 ? SN 06:35 0:00 rosetta_beta_4.84_i686-pc-linux-gnu xx 1dcj _ -abrelax -string boinc 24075 0.0 0.9 7180 2356 ? S 08:42 0:00 /usr/sbin/sshd boinc 24076 0.0 0.9 3476 2336 pts/4 S 08:42 0:00 -bash boinc 24567 0.0 0.2 2084 624 ? SN 10:27 0:00 sleep 600 boinc 24603 0.0 0.2 2548 672 pts/4 R 10:36 0:00 ps xu crobertp [/home/boinc/BOINC] > Restarting boinc ... Click signature for global team stats |
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
stuck at 80.41% Rosetta_betta_4.84 Linux Update - after boinc restart WU run by some time, and now stuck at 85.48% this message appeared on my remote ssh Linux console´ crobertp [/home/boinc/BOINC] > *** glibc detected *** malloc(): memory corruption: 0x40237a45 *** crobertp [/home/boinc/BOINC] > w 12:23pm up 14 days, 19:04, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.09 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT saigam pts/0 matrix.cp3 Mon10pm 2:24m 0.13s 0.13s -bash boinc pts/4 200.149.209.246 8:42am 0.00s 8:29 0.01s w crobertp [/home/boinc/BOINC] > ps xu USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND boinc 27682 0.0 0.4 2616 1036 ? SN Feb17 0:00 /bin/bash ./yasuc.sh boinc 24075 0.0 0.9 7220 2380 ? S 08:42 0:00 /usr/sbin/sshd boinc 24076 0.0 0.9 3476 2340 pts/4 S 08:42 0:00 -bash boinc 24631 0.0 1.4 5732 3544 pts/4 S 10:45 0:00 ./boinc -redirectio -allow_remote_gui_rpc -return_results_imme boinc 24875 20.8 24.5 118684 60992 pts/4 SN 11:43 8:28 rosetta_beta_4.84_i686-pc-linux-gnu xx 1dcj _ -abrelax -string boinc 24876 0.0 24.5 118684 60992 pts/4 SN 11:43 0:00 rosetta_beta_4.84_i686-pc-linux-gnu xx 1dcj _ -abrelax -string boinc 24877 0.0 24.5 118684 60992 pts/4 SN 11:43 0:00 rosetta_beta_4.84_i686-pc-linux-gnu xx 1dcj _ -abrelax -string boinc 24990 0.0 0.2 2084 624 ? SN 12:17 0:00 sleep 600 boinc 25012 0.0 0.2 2548 672 pts/4 R 12:24 0:00 ps xu crobertp [/home/boinc/BOINC] > Restarting boinc again ... BTW: When will the Linux app be staticaly linked ? -or- may be the purpose is disallowing who owns a Linux Pc w/ Kernel 2.4.x from crunching rosetta ? Click signature for global team stats |
Spare_Cycles Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 17 Credit: 12,942 RAC: 0 |
this message appeared on my remote ssh Linux console´ Have you checked this computer with programs like memtest86 and Super Pi? may be the purpose is disallowing who owns a Linux Pc w/ Kernel 2.4.x from I have five Linux PC Kernel 2.4.x computers running RALPH. So far they have completed all WUs successfully except for a few that nobody seems able to crunch. |
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
SIGSEGV11 Rosetta_Beta_4.84 Linux https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=13093 Click signature for global team stats |
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
process got signal 11 Rosetta_beta_4.84 Linux https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=13267 Click signature for global team stats |
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
Exit status 139 (0x8b) Rosetta_beta_4.84 Linux https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=12969 Click signature for global team stats |
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
pure virtual method called Rosetta_beta_4.84 Linux https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=9280 Click signature for global team stats |
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
this message appeared on my remote ssh Linux console´ Yes, I looked at a few of u results, and seems OK (aleatory choosen results) May be I used wrong wording ... not english my native idiom. What I really mean is that is possible to to have the same Kernel 2.4.x build with original Libc.6.so -or- newer libc.6.so -:) *All dependes on the date u buy u Linux CD or magazine containing it, for free. My system is commercial, and was built some years ago ... These are the libc I am using ... crobertp [/home/boinc/BOINC] > ls /lib/libc* -lha -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.2M Oct 13 2004 /lib/libc-2.3.2.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Oct 18 2004 /lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.3.2.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 May 3 2003 /lib/libcap.so.1 -> libcap.so.1.10 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9.2k Jan 31 2003 /lib/libcap.so.1.10 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 May 3 2003 /lib/libcom_err.so.2 -> libcom_err.so.2.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5.3k Jan 6 2003 /lib/libcom_err.so.2.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18k Oct 13 2004 /lib/libcrypt-2.3.2.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Oct 18 2004 /lib/libcrypt.so.1 -> libcrypt-2.3.2.so crobertp [/home/boinc/BOINC] > note the year of 2003 - in almost all of them ... *Very hard to update libc.so.6 - better building a new system , to replace the actual . what I cannot do for now . *lack of spare hardware resources and time. My conclusion: IF the executable cannot be linked static to avoid these libc.so.6 incompatibilities, I will have to find another project to crunch. *In fact rosetta worked well into this pc, for some time ... Then a rosetta for Linux version Update ... (compiled with newer libc) and the problems started ... Oh well!, at least simap is working on this pc without any errors, so, u see is not difficult to find another project ... perhaps others too, *only I does not have yet tested them all - what works vs what does not works Thanks Click signature for global team stats |
Spare_Cycles Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 17 Credit: 12,942 RAC: 0 |
build with original Libc.6.so -or- newer libc.6.so -:) My gentoo installs would be the newer libc.6.so. The "2.4.20-4GB-athlon" install is SuSE 8.2 and most of the libs are dated march 13 2003 and seem to be version 2.3.2. I don't know why these would work but not yours. |
Mistral Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 1 Credit: 352 RAC: 0 |
Same (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) error in WU 11509 WU's name: cap_24_fullatom_cap4_dec00_10_231_4_1 stderr out: <core_client_version>5.2.13</core_client_version> <message>Fonction incorrecte. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> </stderr_txt> Win 2k SP4, application version = 4.90, all presets = default |
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
MacOS Error -43 occured in Mac_Lib.c line 64 Rosetta 4.82 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=12137116 While looking at the results of the "user of day" on rosetta web site, I found this error (result was considered valid) though -:( These incompatibilities between C lib(s) versions are occuring not only on Linux ... as above we see, on Mac/Darwin too. imho: Is need to make all applications static If we want app running on *all* pcs ... Otherwise we can start donwnloading the source code and building the app into each pc , before running it. -or- alternatively start writting app into another language that does not deppend on "shared libray(s)" eg: Assembly Click signature for global team stats |
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
Ananas get error exit 1 (0x1) into bbc climate prediction app too He relates this error in that case, to a missing .dll on c:winntsystem32 mscoree.dll Seems then, that windows app need be static too I never see that dll on my windows 3.11 -or- 95/98 .hehe read here the full thread, if u want http://boinc.bio.wzw.tum.de/boincsimap/forum/viewtopic.php?t=248 |
Robert Everly Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 10 Credit: 2,333 RAC: 0 |
Haven't seen this error before. I checked in on how things were going, saw a 4.91, gave the graphics a shot. It ran for a couple of minutes, then went all wacky. The accepted protein model disappared as did both graphs. It advanced a couple of steps and hard locked the computer. Also got a bunch of runtime error popup boxes. No screenshots though with the lockup. Had to do a cold reboot. Anyway, here is the wu. https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=13679 and the error result. <core_client_version>5.2.12</core_client_version> |
doc :) Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 46 Credit: 4,437 RAC: 0 |
got this one with 4.91: 03/03/2006 02:06:15|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result BARCODE_30_1iibA_227_10_1 ( - exit code -1073741811 (0xc000000d)) grahpics were open in a window (for more than a hour or so) then it simply crashed, thats the same error i am getting with rosetta 4.82 when i got graphics open, all seems to work fine when i do not open graphics. WU - result |
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Report - Previously Unclassified Work Unit Errors
©2024 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org