Report - Previously Unclassified Work Unit Errors
Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Report - Previously Unclassified Work Unit Errors
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
STE\/E Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 27 Credit: 2,226,442 RAC: 783 |
Those WU's should have been aborted Tony, I see you still have 1 WU on host 103 that will error out too (BARCODE_30_1iibA_219_2) if you run it. It already says Canceled in the WU ID Page ... |
 AstroSend message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 141 Credit: 32,977 RAC: 0 |
Those WU's should have been aborted Tony, I see you still have 1 WU on host 103 that will error out too (BARCODE_30_1iibA_219_2) if you run it. It already says Canceled in the WU ID Page ... I thought it was abort earlier than 4.87 not earlier than or equal to? OK off I go to abort them. Thanks Poorboy with many machines. I just looked and it says "February 24, 2006 Correction Please abort work units on Windows machines that are currently running versions earlier than 4.87. " |
|
STE\/E Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 27 Credit: 2,226,442 RAC: 783 |
Those WU's should have been aborted Tony, I see you still have 1 WU on host 103 that will error out too (BARCODE_30_1iibA_219_2) if you run it. It already says Canceled in the WU ID Page ... No, the ones they wanted aborted were the v4.87 that showed they were Canceled already in the WU ID & any v4.86 or earlier that you still had ... :) |
|
Astro Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 141 Credit: 32,977 RAC: 0 |
I went to my results and see several that "comp errored" out. Hmmm, Must have happened while I slept (strange, I don't remember sleeping that much, short nap here, short nap there, that's about it for me). LOL |
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
Access Violation - Rosetta_beta_4.89 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=10919 *pc undisturbed when this occured - I was out for about 1 hour ... *no one else has access to this pc Click signature for global team stats  
|
Nuadormrac Send message Joined: 22 Feb 06 Posts: 68 Credit: 11,362 RAC: 0 |
Maximum disk usage space exceeded error, in 4.89 result https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=10997 stderr out <core_client_version>5.2.13</core_client_version> <message>Maximum disk usage exceeded </message> <stderr_txt> # random seed: 3989828 # cpu_run_time_pref: 28800 Comp was running when I was in bed last night, and when I got up to do some things. Errored out when I was away from it. Computer behind locked door (in my apartment) and no one else has access... Only other thing going on, is I'm downloading a torrent via Azureus, albeit the download is being written to a seperate (external) hard drive, on a seperate controller (USB for the external drive, vs. a SCSI adapter for the system/BOINC drive), which neither BOINC, nor the operating system itself are installed on, or run from... Any files that are needed for this one? |
|
Marky-UK Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 5 Credit: 1,530 RAC: 0 |
WU 11498 failed after 44 seconds for me. It looks like it also failed after 83 seconds for someone else. <message>Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> |
|
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
Access Violation Rosetta_beta_4.89 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=12011 Previous to occurring that access violation ... Date Host Project ID Message 2/28/2006 9:01:40 AM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 21 Aborting result HOMSb7_homDB030_1b72__226_4_0: exceeded disk limit: 200022677.000000 > 200000000.000000 2/28/2006 9:01:40 AM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 22 Unrecoverable error for result HOMSb7_homDB030_1b72__226_4_0 (Maximum disk usage exceeded) 2/28/2006 9:01:41 AM carlos.cp3 --- 23 request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 2/28/2006 9:01:41 AM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 24 Computation for result HOMSb7_homDB030_1b72__226_4_0 finished 2/28/2006 9:01:41 AM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 25 Starting result HOMSb7_homDB001_1b72__226_5_0 using rosetta_beta version 489 2/28/2006 9:02:41 AM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 26 Sending scheduler request to https://ralph.bakerlab.org/ralph_cgi/cgi 2/28/2006 9:02:41 AM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 27 Reason: To report results 2/28/2006 9:02:41 AM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 28 Reporting 1 results 2/28/2006 9:03:02 AM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 29 Scheduler request to https://ralph.bakerlab.org/ralph_cgi/cgi succeeded I have more than 2 GB of free disk space and my preferences for disk usage are set high enough to support a GB result file Oh! ??? Why not finish the WU when it top on u size limits, instead of aborting it? Click signature for global team stats
|
|
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
Exit status -1073741819 (0xffffffffc0000005) Rosetta_Beta_4.89 https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=12012 I see in other threads that we are testing 4.90 !? Why I am not ??? This WU was sent me today and when I try refreshing the project I get Date Host Project ID Message 2/28/2006 10:12:29 AM carlos.cp3 ralph@home 81 No work from project Thus, I am assuming that there are only 4.89 WU s -- at least for me -:( Now Ill play a game - NO WUs to test -:( Click signature for global team stats
|
|
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
stuck at 80.41% Rosetta_betta_4.84 Linux https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=13007 not using CPU -> load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.07 crobertp [/home/boinc/BOINC] > ps xu USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND boinc 27682 0.0 0.4 2616 1036 ? SN Feb17 0:00 /bin/bash ./yasuc.sh boinc 23482 0.0 1.5 5868 3740 ? S 05:58 0:02 ./boinc -redirectio -allow_remote_gui_rpc -return_results_imme boinc 23621 44.8 27.4 172164 68060 ? SN 06:35 108:08 rosetta_beta_4.84_i686-pc-linux-gnu xx 1dcj _ -abrelax -string boinc 23622 0.0 27.4 172164 68060 ? SN 06:35 0:00 rosetta_beta_4.84_i686-pc-linux-gnu xx 1dcj _ -abrelax -string boinc 23623 0.0 27.4 172164 68060 ? SN 06:35 0:00 rosetta_beta_4.84_i686-pc-linux-gnu xx 1dcj _ -abrelax -string boinc 24075 0.0 0.9 7180 2356 ? S 08:42 0:00 /usr/sbin/sshd boinc 24076 0.0 0.9 3476 2336 pts/4 S 08:42 0:00 -bash boinc 24567 0.0 0.2 2084 624 ? SN 10:27 0:00 sleep 600 boinc 24603 0.0 0.2 2548 672 pts/4 R 10:36 0:00 ps xu crobertp [/home/boinc/BOINC] > Restarting boinc ... Click signature for global team stats
|
|
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
stuck at 80.41% Rosetta_betta_4.84 Linux Update - after boinc restart WU run by some time, and now stuck at 85.48% this message appeared on my remote ssh Linux console´ crobertp [/home/boinc/BOINC] > *** glibc detected *** malloc(): memory corruption: 0x40237a45 *** crobertp [/home/boinc/BOINC] > w 12:23pm up 14 days, 19:04, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.09 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT saigam pts/0 matrix.cp3 Mon10pm 2:24m 0.13s 0.13s -bash boinc pts/4 200.149.209.246 8:42am 0.00s 8:29 0.01s w crobertp [/home/boinc/BOINC] > ps xu USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND boinc 27682 0.0 0.4 2616 1036 ? SN Feb17 0:00 /bin/bash ./yasuc.sh boinc 24075 0.0 0.9 7220 2380 ? S 08:42 0:00 /usr/sbin/sshd boinc 24076 0.0 0.9 3476 2340 pts/4 S 08:42 0:00 -bash boinc 24631 0.0 1.4 5732 3544 pts/4 S 10:45 0:00 ./boinc -redirectio -allow_remote_gui_rpc -return_results_imme boinc 24875 20.8 24.5 118684 60992 pts/4 SN 11:43 8:28 rosetta_beta_4.84_i686-pc-linux-gnu xx 1dcj _ -abrelax -string boinc 24876 0.0 24.5 118684 60992 pts/4 SN 11:43 0:00 rosetta_beta_4.84_i686-pc-linux-gnu xx 1dcj _ -abrelax -string boinc 24877 0.0 24.5 118684 60992 pts/4 SN 11:43 0:00 rosetta_beta_4.84_i686-pc-linux-gnu xx 1dcj _ -abrelax -string boinc 24990 0.0 0.2 2084 624 ? SN 12:17 0:00 sleep 600 boinc 25012 0.0 0.2 2548 672 pts/4 R 12:24 0:00 ps xu crobertp [/home/boinc/BOINC] > Restarting boinc again ... BTW: When will the Linux app be staticaly linked ? -or- may be the purpose is disallowing who owns a Linux Pc w/ Kernel 2.4.x from crunching rosetta ? Click signature for global team stats
|
|
Spare_Cycles Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 17 Credit: 12,942 RAC: 0 |
this message appeared on my remote ssh Linux console´ Have you checked this computer with programs like memtest86 and Super Pi? may be the purpose is disallowing who owns a Linux Pc w/ Kernel 2.4.x from I have five Linux PC Kernel 2.4.x computers running RALPH. So far they have completed all WUs successfully except for a few that nobody seems able to crunch. |
|
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
SIGSEGV11 Rosetta_Beta_4.84 Linux https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=13093 Click signature for global team stats
|
|
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
process got signal 11 Rosetta_beta_4.84 Linux https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=13267 Click signature for global team stats
|
|
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
Exit status 139 (0x8b) Rosetta_beta_4.84 Linux https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=12969 Click signature for global team stats
|
|
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
pure virtual method called Rosetta_beta_4.84 Linux https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=9280 Click signature for global team stats
|
|
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
this message appeared on my remote ssh Linux console´ Yes, I looked at a few of u results, and seems OK (aleatory choosen results) May be I used wrong wording ... not english my native idiom. What I really mean is that is possible to to have the same Kernel 2.4.x build with original Libc.6.so -or- newer libc.6.so -:) *All dependes on the date u buy u Linux CD or magazine containing it, for free. My system is commercial, and was built some years ago ... These are the libc I am using ... crobertp [/home/boinc/BOINC] > ls /lib/libc* -lha -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.2M Oct 13 2004 /lib/libc-2.3.2.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Oct 18 2004 /lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.3.2.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 May 3 2003 /lib/libcap.so.1 -> libcap.so.1.10 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9.2k Jan 31 2003 /lib/libcap.so.1.10 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 May 3 2003 /lib/libcom_err.so.2 -> libcom_err.so.2.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5.3k Jan 6 2003 /lib/libcom_err.so.2.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18k Oct 13 2004 /lib/libcrypt-2.3.2.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Oct 18 2004 /lib/libcrypt.so.1 -> libcrypt-2.3.2.so crobertp [/home/boinc/BOINC] > note the year of 2003 - in almost all of them ... *Very hard to update libc.so.6 - better building a new system , to replace the actual . what I cannot do for now . *lack of spare hardware resources and time. My conclusion: IF the executable cannot be linked static to avoid these libc.so.6 incompatibilities, I will have to find another project to crunch. *In fact rosetta worked well into this pc, for some time ... Then a rosetta for Linux version Update ... (compiled with newer libc) and the problems started ... Oh well!, at least simap is working on this pc without any errors, so, u see is not difficult to find another project ... perhaps others too, *only I does not have yet tested them all - what works vs what does not works Thanks Click signature for global team stats
|
|
Spare_Cycles Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 17 Credit: 12,942 RAC: 0 |
build with original Libc.6.so -or- newer libc.6.so -:) My gentoo installs would be the newer libc.6.so. The "2.4.20-4GB-athlon" install is SuSE 8.2 and most of the libs are dated march 13 2003 and seem to be version 2.3.2. I don't know why these would work but not yours. |
|
Mistral Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 1 Credit: 352 RAC: 0 |
Same (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) error in WU 11509 WU's name: cap_24_fullatom_cap4_dec00_10_231_4_1 stderr out: <core_client_version>5.2.13</core_client_version> <message>Fonction incorrecte. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> </stderr_txt> Win 2k SP4, application version = 4.90, all presets = default |
|
Carlos_Pfitzner Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 182 Credit: 22,792 RAC: 0 |
MacOS Error -43 occured in Mac_Lib.c line 64 Rosetta 4.82 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=12137116 While looking at the results of the "user of day" on rosetta web site, I found this error (result was considered valid) though -:( These incompatibilities between C lib(s) versions are occuring not only on Linux ... as above we see, on Mac/Darwin too. imho: Is need to make all applications static If we want app running on *all* pcs ... Otherwise we can start donwnloading the source code and building the app into each pc , before running it. -or- alternatively start writting app into another language that does not deppend on "shared libray(s)" eg: Assembly Click signature for global team stats
|
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Report - Previously Unclassified Work Unit Errors
©2024 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org