Minirosetta beta 3.56-3.58

Author	Message
dekim Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 20 Jan 06 Posts: 250 Credit: 543,579 RAC: 0	Message 5834 - Posted: 2 Apr 2015, 22:25:42 UTC This version is built from the latest Rosetta code base which includes many code refactoring updates and new/updated protocols. It has been quite a while since our last update. We've also included a linux graphics application. Please post bugs/issues here. ID: 5834 · Reply Quote

[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 910 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294	Message 5835 - Posted: 5 Apr 2015, 17:07:59 UTC - in response to Message 5834. Waiting for a lot of work to test!! :-) ID: 5835 · Reply Quote

[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 910 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294	Message 5836 - Posted: 8 Apr 2015, 16:08:14 UTC Two wus, two errors (on Win8) 3375739 3375746 Validate errors Setting WU description ... Unpacking zip data: ../../projects/ralph.bakerlab.org/minirosetta_database_14d5f91.zip Setting database description ... Setting up checkpointing ... Setting up graphics native ... BOINC:: Worker startup. Starting watchdog... Watchdog active. # cpu_run_time_pref: 7200 ====================================================== DONE :: 1866 starting structures 7199.41 cpu seconds This process generated 1866 decoys from 1866 attempts ====================================================== BOINC :: WS_max 2.59871e+008 BOINC :: Watchdog shutting down... BOINC :: BOINC support services shutting down cleanly ... called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ID: 5836 · Reply Quote

[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 910 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294	Message 5837 - Posted: 9 Apr 2015, 9:46:02 UTC - in response to Message 5836. Two wus, two errors (on Win8) 3375739 3375746 Validate errors Same on win7. It's time to update validator?? :-P ID: 5837 · Reply Quote

[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 910 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294	Message 5838 - Posted: 16 Apr 2015, 12:23:27 UTC No new tasks to test this version?? It's ready for production on Rosetta? ID: 5838 · Reply Quote

Viking69 Send message Joined: 21 Feb 06 Posts: 8 Credit: 128,054 RAC: 0	Message 5839 - Posted: 19 Apr 2015, 17:37:08 UTC I am getting this message from the servers. 4/19/2015 10:35:01 AM \| \| Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site 4/19/2015 10:35:02 AM \| \| Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down. But on the site all look UP. ID: 5839 · Reply Quote

[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 910 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294	Message 5840 - Posted: 28 Apr 2015, 7:49:21 UTC I cannot understand if admins are interested in test this new app or not... ID: 5840 · Reply Quote

dekim Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 20 Jan 06 Posts: 250 Credit: 543,579 RAC: 0	Message 5844 - Posted: 2 Jun 2015, 23:43:49 UTC We should start up testing again with the recent 3.58 update. This version adds support for cyclic peptide modeling. We put testing on hold until we got this feature added. ID: 5844 · Reply Quote

[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 910 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294	Message 5845 - Posted: 3 Jun 2015, 13:41:32 UTC - in response to Message 5844. Last modified: 3 Jun 2015, 13:42:08 UTC We put testing on hold until we got this feature added. Can we, therefore, hope for some batches?? :-P ID: 5845 · Reply Quote

Conan Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 364 Credit: 1,368,421 RAC: 0	Message 5846 - Posted: 7 Jun 2015, 8:41:52 UTC - in response to Message 5844. We should start up testing again with the recent 3.58 update. This version adds support for cyclic peptide modeling. We put testing on hold until we got this feature added. So why did we get 3.54 work units over the past few days? Should we not be testing the 3.58 work? Conan ID: 5846 · Reply Quote

[VENETO] boboviz Send message Joined: 9 Apr 08 Posts: 910 Credit: 1,892,541 RAC: 294	Message 5847 - Posted: 7 Jun 2015, 20:42:57 UTC - in response to Message 5846. So why did we get 3.54 work units over the past few days? Should we not be testing the 3.58 work? I've crunched some 3.54 but also some 3.58 like this ID: 5847 · Reply Quote

Chilean Send message Joined: 31 Jul 09 Posts: 12 Credit: 38,068 RAC: 0	Message 5850 - Posted: 10 Jun 2015, 20:26:39 UTC Admins, take a look at: https://ralph.bakerlab.org/forum_thread.php?id=564#5843 It'd be great if you could do a quick recompile and distribute it on RALPH to test it out! ID: 5850 · Reply Quote