41)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug Reports for Minirosetta v1.39
(Message 4307)
Posted 26 Oct 2008 by AdeB Post: 1151331 stderr out: <core_client_version>5.10.45</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 193 (0xc1, -63) </message> <stderr_txt> # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400 recovering checkpoint of tag S_1LVHA_6_00000001 with id abrelax_rg_state SIGSEGV: segmentation violation Stack trace (12 frames): [0x8b104a7] [0x8b3aba0] [0xffffe420] [0x81723f8] [0x81822ae] [0x8181580] [0x8180f11] [0x8131626] [0x8133829] [0x804b891] [0x8b9669c] [0x8048111] Exiting... </stderr_txt> ]]> |
42)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug Reports for Minirosetta v1.36
(Message 4290)
Posted 23 Oct 2008 by AdeB Post: Two workunits running too long, both with error after calling boinc_finish. 1141183: Rosetta is going too long. Watchdog is ending the run! CPU time: 50277.8 seconds. Greater than 3X preferred time: 14400 seconds ********************************************************************** called boinc_finish SIGSEGV: segmentation violation 1142108: Rosetta is going too long. Watchdog is ending the run! CPU time: 50018.7 seconds. Greater than 3X preferred time: 14400 seconds ********************************************************************** called boinc_finish SIGILL: illegal instruction |
43)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug Reports for Minirosetta v1.36
(Message 4284)
Posted 16 Oct 2008 by AdeB Post: At this moment i have a ralph and a rosetta task running at the same time on a single-core computer, both using 50 %CPU. Some time later i saw the same thing happening on my other PC with a rosetta work unit. This w.u. was the only one running, when i checked 20 minutes later it had status 'Waiting to run' but was still running side by site with a Seti work unit. I've let them run and both work units had a valid result. So apparently these tasks sometimes don't react to the boinc-command to suspend. Which is a bad thing when you look at it from any other boinc-project, but it does not screw up the science. |
44)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug Reports for Minirosetta v1.36
(Message 4274)
Posted 14 Oct 2008 by AdeB Post: At this moment i have a ralph and a rosetta task running at the same time on a single-core computer, both using 50 %CPU. The ralph task has the status 'Waiting to run' in boinc manager, and it is a hombench_tex_looprelax_tex_cst_oneparam_looprelax_tex_...-task, so that is the one i'm going to abort. Something is seriously wrong with these tasks. |
45)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug Reports for Minirosetta v1.36
(Message 4271)
Posted 13 Oct 2008 by AdeB Post: five failures: 1127424, 1127480, 1127566, 1128390 and 1122258. All have the name: hombench_tex_looprelax_tex_cst_oneparam_looprelax_tex_cst_... and all have the same error: ERROR: NANs occured in hbonding! ERROR:: Exit from: src/core/scoring/hbonds/hbonds_geom.cc line: 763 called boinc_finish And this one ran too long. stderr out: <core_client_version>5.10.45</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400 ********************************************************************** Rosetta is going too long. Watchdog is ending the run! CPU time: 49551.9 seconds. Greater than 3X preferred time: 14400 seconds ********************************************************************** called boinc_finish SIGSEGV: segmentation violation Stack trace (20 frames): [0x89f8027] [0x8a22720] [0xffffe420] [0x887f36b] [0x82f934a] [0x830358d] [0x8749cb6] [0x8945431] [0x874b4a6] [0x874e760] [0x8749400] [0x8066196] [0x8084942] [0x8092d68] [0x808c16e] [0x805e8f8] [0x809795c] [0x804bed3] [0x8a7e21c] [0x8048111] Exiting... </stderr_txt> ]]> |
46)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug Reports for Minirosetta v1.36
(Message 4251)
Posted 8 Oct 2008 by AdeB Post: task 1109308 and task 1111517 ERROR: NANs occured in hbonding! ERROR:: Exit from: src/core/scoring/hbonds/hbonds_geom.cc line: 763 and Granted credit: 0 for both after running more than 4 hours. |
47)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug Reports for Minirosetta v1.36
(Message 4240)
Posted 6 Oct 2008 by AdeB Post: May I ask where the heck Application Version 1.00 came from if we are supposed to be up to 1.36 ??? A few days ago there was a new application running on my computer: minirosetta_split_terms version 100. |
48)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug Reports for Rosetta version 5.98
(Message 4227)
Posted 29 Sep 2008 by AdeB Post: This task had an error at startup. stderr out: <core_client_version>5.10.45</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 1 (0x1, -255) </message> <stderr_txt> Graphics are disabled due to configuration... ERROR:: Exit from: options.cc line: 525 </stderr_txt> ]]> |
49)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug Reports for Minirosetta version 1.34
(Message 4220)
Posted 26 Sep 2008 by AdeB Post: Hmm, "NANs occured in hbonding!" I don't know what it means, but it didn't give any credit. <core_client_version>5.10.45</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 1 (0x1, -255) </message> <stderr_txt> # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400 ERROR: NANs occured in hbonding! ERROR:: Exit from: src/core/scoring/hbonds/hbonds_geom.cc line: 763 called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> |
50)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug Reports for Rosetta version 5.98
(Message 4172)
Posted 31 Jul 2008 by AdeB Post: segmentation violation |
51)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug report for Minirosetta version 1.29
(Message 4158)
Posted 3 Jul 2008 by AdeB Post: Error in resultid=1050453 stderr out: <core_client_version>5.10.45</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 1 (0x1, -255) </message> <stderr_txt> Unrecognized XML in parse_init_data_file: fraction_done_update_period Skipping: 1.000000 Skipping: /fraction_done_update_period ERROR: Option matching -fragdate not found in command line top-level context </stderr_txt> ]]> |
52)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Scheduler/Server Problems?
(Message 4068)
Posted 26 May 2008 by AdeB Post: No errors here on 5/25 and 5/26. |
53)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
minirosetta v1.24 bug thread
(Message 4059)
Posted 24 May 2008 by AdeB Post: Workunit 972507 stderr out <core_client_version>5.10.45</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 1 (0x1, -255) </message> <stderr_txt> ERROR: Option matching -description_file not found in command line top-level context </stderr_txt> ]]> |
54)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
minirosetta 1.19 bug thread
(Message 4013)
Posted 8 May 2008 by AdeB Post: resultid=950809 <core_client_version>5.10.45</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400 ====================================================== DONE :: 1 starting structures 11991.7 cpu seconds This process generated 2 decoys from 2 attempts ====================================================== BOINC :: Watchdog shutting down... BOINC :: BOINC support services shutting down... called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> <message> <file_xfer_error> <file_name>1tig__BOINC_ABRELAX_IGNORE_THE_REST-S25-17-S3-17--1tig_-_3581_28_1_0</file_name> <error_code>-161</error_code> </file_xfer_error> </message> ]]> |
55)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.96
(Message 4000)
Posted 7 May 2008 by AdeB Post: Had these two fail with the same error after 14 seconds, Same error here in resultid=949856 and resultid=949857 |
56)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
minirosetta 1.19 bug thread
(Message 3999)
Posted 7 May 2008 by AdeB Post: Rack up another "compute error" for me and my wing man. This one failed immediately at start up on my PC: Similar error in resultid=950615 <core_client_version>5.10.45</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 1 (0x1, -255) </message> <stderr_txt> ERROR: Option matching -psipred_ss2:1opd_.fa_max_dis_9.psipred_ss2 not found in command line top-level context </stderr_txt> ]]> |
57)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.96
(Message 3890)
Posted 12 Apr 2008 by AdeB Post: 2 errors, both on linux PC's. resultid=905699 stderr out: <core_client_version>5.10.28</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 193 (0xc1, -63) </message> <stderr_txt> Graphics are disabled due to configuration... # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400 # random seed: 1398092 SIGSEGV: segmentation violation Stack trace (14 frames): [0x8e1b49b] [0x8e15d8c] [0xffffe420] [0x8c836d4] [0x87d2748] [0x87d7a5e] [0x8d6bbd9] [0x8b89e24] [0x8b8c203] [0x8629ccb] [0x8768a9f] [0x8768b4a] [0x8e80034] [0x8048111] Exiting... </stderr_txt> ]]> resultid=885864 stderr out: <core_client_version>5.10.28</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 1 (0x1, -255) </message> <stderr_txt> Graphics are disabled due to configuration... # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400 # random seed: 1417106 ERROR:: Exit from: minimize.cc line: 2088 </stderr_txt> ]]> |
58)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug reports for 5.96
(Message 3842)
Posted 31 Mar 2008 by AdeB Post: What happened with this workunit? Stderr out looks normal to me. Valid state: Workunit error - check skipped |
59)
Message boards :
RALPH@home bug list :
Bug Reports for Rosetta Mini Versions 1.+
(Message 3809)
Posted 29 Feb 2008 by AdeB Post: Error in resultid=798264 <core_client_version>5.10.28</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 1 (0x1, -255) </message> <stderr_txt> Graphics are disabled due to configuration... # cpu_run_time_pref: 14400 Failed to find rotamer: 3 0 2 Amongst options: 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 1 3 2 3 3 1 1 1 3 2 3 1 2 1 2 2 3 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 3 3 1 3 1 3 1 2 2 2 1 3 3 2 2 1 2 2 3 2 1 1 2 3 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 3 3 2 1 3 1 1 3 2 3 1 ERROR:: Exit from: src/core/scoring/dunbrack/SingleResidueDunbrackLibrary.tmpl.hh line: 142 called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> |
60)
Message boards :
Current tests :
Help us debug minirosetta.
(Message 3773)
Posted 20 Feb 2008 by AdeB Post: I'm sometimes getting double of what I'm claiming. Not all linux machines get more credit than claimed. My mobile AMD Athlon(tm) XP2500+ gets less than half of claimed, on Beta tasks it got more. On my AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2000+ there isn't much difference between Mini and Beta tasks |
©2024 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org