RALPH@home

Bug reports for Ralph 5.23

  UW Seal
 
[ Home ] [ Join ] [ About ] [ Participants ] [ Community ] [ Statistics ]
  [ login/out ]


Advanced search

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.23

AuthorMessage
Rhiju
Forum moderator
Project developer
Project scientist

Joined: Feb 14 06
Posts: 161
ID: 4
Credit: 3,725
RAC: 0
Message 1807 - Posted 10 Jun 2006 1:25:34 UTC

    We fixed something in the interaction of Rosetta with BOINC to trigger more informative debugging messages upon crashes. Please continue to post what goes wrong!
    ____________

    Profile Fuzzy Hollynoodles
    Avatar

    Joined: Feb 19 06
    Posts: 37
    ID: 585
    Credit: 2,089
    RAC: 0
    Message 1815 - Posted 11 Jun 2006 11:18:05 UTC - in response to Message 1807.

      We fixed something in the interaction of Rosetta with BOINC to trigger more informative debugging messages upon crashes. Please continue to post what goes wrong!


      We will, as soon we\'re able to get some. :-/



      ____________
      "I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world." - Me

      Neal

      Joined: Mar 6 06
      Posts: 4
      ID: 997
      Credit: 32,213
      RAC: 0
      Message 1816 - Posted 11 Jun 2006 18:11:08 UTC

        How long has the site been \"Down for maintenance\"? Neal

        [B^S] sTrey
        Avatar

        Joined: Feb 15 06
        Posts: 58
        ID: 36
        Credit: 15,430
        RAC: 0
        Message 1817 - Posted 11 Jun 2006 18:32:17 UTC

          At least as long as this thread has been going, so at least 24 hours. Going to blow past workunit deadlines soon :(

          Pieface

          Joined: Feb 16 06
          Posts: 64
          ID: 234
          Credit: 203,513
          RAC: 0
          Message 1818 - Posted 11 Jun 2006 18:44:09 UTC

            Looks like it \'went down\' sometime late friday. Maybe when they re-started the Rosetta server after the boinc upgrade they forgot to check on poor old second-cousin Ralphie!

            Rhiju
            Forum moderator
            Project developer
            Project scientist

            Joined: Feb 14 06
            Posts: 161
            ID: 4
            Credit: 3,725
            RAC: 0
            Message 1819 - Posted 11 Jun 2006 22:37:37 UTC - in response to Message 1818.

              Last modified: 11 Jun 2006 22:38:03 UTC

              It was a database problem, and the database guy on our team was unavailable. Ralph\'s back!

              Looks like it \'went down\' sometime late friday. Maybe when they re-started the Rosetta server after the boinc upgrade they forgot to check on poor old second-cousin Ralphie!


              ____________

              IceQueen41
              Avatar

              Joined: Feb 22 06
              Posts: 6
              ID: 692
              Credit: 9,473
              RAC: 0
              Message 1820 - Posted 12 Jun 2006 2:33:49 UTC

                Not sure if this is a bug or not, but in the graphics for this WU, the protein simply isn\'t there, though everything else appears to be running properly. Also, I\'m sure this has been mentioned (haven\'t been around much lately), but with most of the WU graphics, when opened a second (and then third, etc) time, the information at the bottom is shifted down so that the bottom line (the project URL & Accepted Energy) is not visible. Other than that, everything looks good so far.
                ____________

                Sadir

                Joined: Feb 21 06
                Posts: 6
                ID: 672
                Credit: 1,419
                RAC: 0
                Message 1821 - Posted 12 Jun 2006 8:32:14 UTC

                  Last modified: 12 Jun 2006 8:36:38 UTC

                  1)I don\'t know if this was not mentioned early, but the progres counting don\'t work well.
                  6 min ... 1.020%
                  24 min ... 1.041% (8:21:56 to completion)
                  40 min ... 1.042% (8:38:22 to completion)
                  1:09:30 ... completion
                  (I saw this also with 5.22)

                  2)More memory need?
                  12/06/2006 09:42:53|ralph@home|Message from server: Your computer has only 402116608 bytes of memory; workunit requires 97883392 more bytes

                  ____________

                  doc :)

                  Joined: Feb 16 06
                  Posts: 46
                  ID: 60
                  Credit: 4,437
                  RAC: 0
                  Message 1823 - Posted 12 Jun 2006 15:15:34 UTC

                    Sadir: the percentage complete thing is perfectly normal, the first model just took that long.

                    no errors with 5.23 so far here, couple of successfull WUs finished.

                    Profile Astro

                    Joined: Feb 16 06
                    Posts: 141
                    ID: 48
                    Credit: 32,977
                    RAC: 0
                    Message 1825 - Posted 13 Jun 2006 11:24:34 UTC

                      I have a funny (interesting) one. One my laptop (which has been pretty much flawless at Ralph, as opposed to my AMD64 3700 sandiego which experiences the \"fatal windows\" error) I\'ve seen something happen twice in 24 hours. I see either the Rosetta 5.22 screensaver or the Ralph 5.23 screensaver will show on my window when I return from some personal task. the graphic will NOT go away by moving a mouse or pressing a key. I had another window open but couldn\'t see it. The mouse would still work on the unseen graphic if I just clicked all over I could hear it interacting, but the Rosetta Graphic would not release my screen. I ended up pressing the power button on both occasions, only to see the HD activity light blink and hear the windows log off Wav, but the Rosetta graphic was still on the screen all the way to Shutdown when the screen when dead.

                      Since mine is the only report of this, it was on both Rosetta and Ralph, and hasn\'t happened with the laptop before, I will be doing some adware/malware/virus/others scans to see if the problem is on my end.

                      tony

                      Aglarond

                      Joined: Feb 16 06
                      Posts: 11
                      ID: 184
                      Credit: 1,094
                      RAC: 0
                      Message 1826 - Posted 14 Jun 2006 10:12:56 UTC

                        Last modified: 14 Jun 2006 10:15:00 UTC

                        Strange error in FRA_t316_CASP7_hom001_1_IGNORE_THE_RESTt316_1_PROTINFO-AB_TS1.pdb_666_2_0 .

                        At first it was running normally but several Simap WUs had errors. Later strange error message has appeared. Something I\'ve never seen before:
                        \"Runtime error!
                        Program: ...alph.bakerlab.org\\rosetta_beta_5.23_windows_intelx86.exe
                        This application has requested the Runtime to terminate it in unusual way. Please contact the application\'s support team for more information.\"
                        Screenshot is here: Ralph_error.gif (7.76KB)

                        My messages:
                        14. 6. 2006 10:50:47|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result FRA_t316_CASP7_hom001_1_IGNORE_THE_RESTt316_1_PROTINFO-AB_TS1.pdb_666_2_0 (The system cannot find the path specified. (0x3) - exit code 3 (0x3))
                        14. 6. 2006 10:50:47|ralph@home|Deferring scheduler requests for 1 minutes and 0 seconds
                        14. 6. 2006 10:50:47||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
                        14. 6. 2006 10:50:47|ralph@home|Computation for task FRA_t316_CASP7_hom001_1_IGNORE_THE_RESTt316_1_PROTINFO-AB_TS1.pdb_666_2_0 finished

                        Full message log: Ralph_error_log_14june2006.txt (40KB)

                        Computer where this error happened is PIII 500MHz, 160MB RAM, WinXP Home SP2, running only antivirus and Boinc with Simap and Ralph. (It has 512MB virtual memory, what is probably not enough for some bigger WUs)

                        After this WU was finished (with error), Simap stopped to make errors and finished next WU successfully.

                        Profile Astro

                        Joined: Feb 16 06
                        Posts: 141
                        ID: 48
                        Credit: 32,977
                        RAC: 0
                        Message 1828 - Posted 15 Jun 2006 10:55:11 UTC

                          Rom had mentioned there might be a fix to the fatal windows errors in 5.23. When it was released, I set the box I usually got these errors with to NNW/NNT for all other projects and suspended them, so I\'d run nothing but 5.23. I\'m not ready to say \"it\'s Fixed\", but so far it sure looks good.
                          177824 158140 14 Jun 2006 19:37:15 UTC 15 Jun 2006 10:43:14 UTC Over Success Done 13,545.38 53.30 53.30
                          177438 157770 14 Jun 2006 15:16:32 UTC 15 Jun 2006 7:36:07 UTC Over Success Done 14,102.19 55.50 55.50
                          176725 156687 14 Jun 2006 7:37:56 UTC 15 Jun 2006 1:10:40 UTC Over Success Done 13,275.25 52.24 52.24
                          176356 156712 14 Jun 2006 3:52:59 UTC 14 Jun 2006 20:28:26 UTC Over Success Done 13,985.28 53.74 53.74
                          175612 151093 13 Jun 2006 20:01:42 UTC 14 Jun 2006 16:47:14 UTC Over Success Done 14,084.34 54.12 54.12
                          174950 155410 13 Jun 2006 13:25:22 UTC 14 Jun 2006 15:16:32 UTC Over Success Done 14,111.06 54.22 54.22
                          174529 155065 13 Jun 2006 9:17:55 UTC 14 Jun 2006 7:37:56 UTC Over Success Done 14,101.56 54.18 54.18
                          174341 154879 13 Jun 2006 6:09:29 UTC 14 Jun 2006 3:52:59 UTC Over Success Done 14,346.30 55.12 55.12
                          173772 154359 12 Jun 2006 22:33:06 UTC 13 Jun 2006 20:01:42 UTC Over Success Done 14,103.70 54.19 54.19
                          173541 154155 12 Jun 2006 19:11:15 UTC 13 Jun 2006 10:39:56 UTC Over Success Done 14,441.13 55.49 55.49
                          170677 146450 11 Jun 2006 22:52:42 UTC 13 Jun 2006 9:17:55 UTC Over Success Done 13,161.97 50.57 50.57
                          170660 146482 11 Jun 2006 22:52:42 UTC 13 Jun 2006 3:03:42 UTC Over Success Done 14,275.66 54.85 54.85
                          170659 146481 11 Jun 2006 22:52:42 UTC 12 Jun 2006 8:30:20 UTC Over Success Done 13,858.98 53.25 53.25

                          william

                          Joined: Jun 3 06
                          Posts: 4
                          ID: 1466
                          Credit: 74
                          RAC: 0
                          Message 1829 - Posted 16 Jun 2006 14:45:21 UTC

                            is this WU a troubled wu? FRA_t301_hom001_1_LOOPRLX_IGNORE_THE_REST__hom001_1_1bwzA__100_701_23_0
                            I have left it running now for 1:34:10 and it is only at 1.623% and finish time is up to 3333:00:01 now and still climbing
                            ____________

                            william

                            Joined: Jun 3 06
                            Posts: 4
                            ID: 1466
                            Credit: 74
                            RAC: 0
                            Message 1830 - Posted 16 Jun 2006 14:49:02 UTC - in response to Message 1829.

                              is this WU a troubled wu? FRA_t301_hom001_1_LOOPRLX_IGNORE_THE_REST__hom001_1_1bwzA__100_701_23_0
                              I have left it running now for 1:34:10 and it is only at 1.623% and finish time is up to 3333:00:01 now and still climbing

                              never mind it just hit 100% will I was typing this into the forums so I am not sure what happened as of yet time was 1:37:27 total
                              ____________

                              Profile Astro

                              Joined: Feb 16 06
                              Posts: 141
                              ID: 48
                              Credit: 32,977
                              RAC: 0
                              Message 1831 - Posted 16 Jun 2006 14:51:23 UTC - in response to Message 1829.

                                is this WU a troubled wu? FRA_t301_hom001_1_LOOPRLX_IGNORE_THE_REST__hom001_1_1bwzA__100_701_23_0
                                I have left it running now for 1:34:10 and it is only at 1.623% and finish time is up to 3333:00:01 now and still climbing

                                the progress indicator isn\'t linear. What you\'ll see are jumps in percetage. All WUs start at 1% and slowly proceed higher until one model is done. Then it jumps to another percentage and the points to the right of the decimal slowly proceed again until the next model is done. I.E you might see this if you checked the status every 10 min: 1.000, 1.0001, 1.0002, 1.003, 12.000, 12.001, 12.002, 12.003, 24.000, 24.001 etc etc until the time runs out where it jumps to 100%, uploads and reports.

                                The number of models depends on protein size, and puter speeds (for the most part). Every WU will run atleast ONE model regardless of time (except where terminated by \"watchdog timer\").

                                does this help?

                                tony

                                william

                                Joined: Jun 3 06
                                Posts: 4
                                ID: 1466
                                Credit: 74
                                RAC: 0
                                Message 1832 - Posted 16 Jun 2006 14:56:26 UTC - in response to Message 1831.

                                  is this WU a troubled wu? FRA_t301_hom001_1_LOOPRLX_IGNORE_THE_REST__hom001_1_1bwzA__100_701_23_0
                                  I have left it running now for 1:34:10 and it is only at 1.623% and finish time is up to 3333:00:01 now and still climbing

                                  the progress indicator isn\'t linear. What you\'ll see are jumps in percetage. All WUs start at 1% and slowly proceed higher until one model is done. Then it jumps to another percentage and the points to the right of the decimal slowly proceed again until the next model is done. I.E you might see this if you checked the status every 10 min: 1.000, 1.0001, 1.0002, 1.003, 12.000, 12.001, 12.002, 12.003, 24.000, 24.001 etc etc until the time runs out where it jumps to 100%, uploads and reports.

                                  The number of models depends on protein size, and puter speeds (for the most part). Every WU will run atleast ONE model regardless of time (except where terminated by \"watchdog timer\").

                                  does this help?

                                  tony

                                  yes and watchdog did terminate that Wu on this computer,

                                  <core_client_version>5.4.9</core_client_version>
                                  <stderr_txt>
                                  # random seed: 2998884
                                  # cpu_run_time_pref: 3600
                                  # DONE :: 1 starting structures built 0 (nstruct) times
                                  # This process generated 1 decoys from 1 attempts
                                  # 0 starting pdbs were skipped


                                  BOINC :: Watchdog shutting down...
                                  BOINC :: BOINC support services shutting down...

                                  </stderr_txt>
                                  is the results of it.
                                  and this is computer so I do not know if this will help in the project

                                  CPU type GenuineIntel
                                  Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.60GHz
                                  Number of CPUs 1
                                  Operating System Microsoft Windows XP
                                  Home Edition, Service Pack 2, (05.01.2600.00)
                                  Memory 510.98 MB
                                  Cache 976.56 KB
                                  Swap space 1248.2 MB
                                  Total disk space 37.26 GB
                                  Free Disk Space 22.39 GB
                                  Measured floating point speed 1329.23 million ops/sec
                                  Measured integer speed 2718.87 million ops/sec
                                  Average upload rate 1.41 KB/sec
                                  Average download rate 132.77 KB/sec

                                  ____________

                                  Profile Astro

                                  Joined: Feb 16 06
                                  Posts: 141
                                  ID: 48
                                  Credit: 32,977
                                  RAC: 0
                                  Message 1833 - Posted 16 Jun 2006 15:29:22 UTC - in response to Message 1832.

                                    Last modified: 16 Jun 2006 15:32:54 UTC

                                    BOINC :: Watchdog shutting down...
                                    BOINC :: BOINC support services shutting down...


                                    This is normal, it just means the wu completed successfully and didn\'t need the watchdog, so it shut it down.

                                    If you\'re talking about wuid=160649, then it completed sucessfully and has been credited. See the \"result ID\" for that WU below

                                    Result ID 180410
                                    Name FRA_t301_hom001_1_LOOPRLX_IGNORE_THE_REST__hom001_1_1bwzA__100_701_23_0
                                    Workunit 160649
                                    Created 15 Jun 2006 22:54:54 UTC
                                    Sent 15 Jun 2006 23:51:21 UTC
                                    Received 16 Jun 2006 14:42:46 UTC
                                    Server state Over
                                    Outcome Success
                                    Client state Done
                                    Exit status 0 (0x0)
                                    Computer ID 2910
                                    Report deadline 19 Jun 2006 23:51:21 UTC
                                    CPU time 5847.390625
                                    stderr out <core_client_version>5.4.9</core_client_version>
                                    <stderr_txt>
                                    # random seed: 2998884
                                    # cpu_run_time_pref: 3600
                                    # DONE :: 1 starting structures built 0 (nstruct) times
                                    # This process generated 1 decoys from 1 attempts
                                    # 0 starting pdbs were skipped


                                    BOINC :: Watchdog shutting down...
                                    BOINC :: BOINC support services shutting down...

                                    </stderr_txt>


                                    Validate state Valid
                                    Claimed credit 13.6983915054668
                                    Granted credit 13.6983915054668
                                    application version 5.23
                                    if the protein is huge, your puter old, or your runtime is set low, then this is what you should be seeing with your future wus. It\'s helping.

                                    tony

                                    Profile Astro

                                    Joined: Feb 16 06
                                    Posts: 141
                                    ID: 48
                                    Credit: 32,977
                                    RAC: 0
                                    Message 1834 - Posted 17 Jun 2006 11:00:00 UTC - in response to Message 1828.

                                      Last modified: 17 Jun 2006 11:05:16 UTC

                                      Rom had mentioned there might be a fix to the fatal windows errors in 5.23. When it was released, I set the box I usually got these errors with to NNW/NNT for all other projects and suspended them, so I\'d run nothing but 5.23. I\'m not ready to say \"it\'s Fixed\", but so far it sure looks good.
                                      177824 158140 14 Jun 2006 19:37:15 UTC 15 Jun 2006 10:43:14 UTC Over Success Done 13,545.38 53.30 53.30
                                      177438 157770 14 Jun 2006 15:16:32 UTC 15 Jun 2006 7:36:07 UTC Over Success Done 14,102.19 55.50 55.50
                                      176725 156687 14 Jun 2006 7:37:56 UTC 15 Jun 2006 1:10:40 UTC Over Success Done 13,275.25 52.24 52.24
                                      176356 156712 14 Jun 2006 3:52:59 UTC 14 Jun 2006 20:28:26 UTC Over Success Done 13,985.28 53.74 53.74
                                      175612 151093 13 Jun 2006 20:01:42 UTC 14 Jun 2006 16:47:14 UTC Over Success Done 14,084.34 54.12 54.12
                                      174950 155410 13 Jun 2006 13:25:22 UTC 14 Jun 2006 15:16:32 UTC Over Success Done 14,111.06 54.22 54.22
                                      174529 155065 13 Jun 2006 9:17:55 UTC 14 Jun 2006 7:37:56 UTC Over Success Done 14,101.56 54.18 54.18
                                      174341 154879 13 Jun 2006 6:09:29 UTC 14 Jun 2006 3:52:59 UTC Over Success Done 14,346.30 55.12 55.12
                                      173772 154359 12 Jun 2006 22:33:06 UTC 13 Jun 2006 20:01:42 UTC Over Success Done 14,103.70 54.19 54.19
                                      173541 154155 12 Jun 2006 19:11:15 UTC 13 Jun 2006 10:39:56 UTC Over Success Done 14,441.13 55.49 55.49
                                      170677 146450 11 Jun 2006 22:52:42 UTC 13 Jun 2006 9:17:55 UTC Over Success Done 13,161.97 50.57 50.57
                                      170660 146482 11 Jun 2006 22:52:42 UTC 13 Jun 2006 3:03:42 UTC Over Success Done 14,275.66 54.85 54.85
                                      170659 146481 11 Jun 2006 22:52:42 UTC 12 Jun 2006 8:30:20 UTC Over Success Done 13,858.98 53.25 53.25

                                      OK, OK I\'m convinced. I haven\'t had any errors of any kind with 5.23. The following WU can be added to the list of successes for my error prone puter:

                                      181942 162058 16 Jun 2006 18:44:02 UTC 17 Jun 2006 10:47:32 UTC Over Success Done 14,364.88 56.53 56.53
                                      181682 161805 16 Jun 2006 14:44:34 UTC 17 Jun 2006 4:16:03 UTC Over Success Done 13,954.83 54.92 54.92
                                      181002 161170 16 Jun 2006 8:41:29 UTC 17 Jun 2006 0:34:09 UTC Over Success Done 13,478.86 53.04 53.04
                                      180751 160956 16 Jun 2006 4:39:34 UTC 16 Jun 2006 20:44:26 UTC Over Success Done 13,756.77 54.14 54.14
                                      180432 151974 15 Jun 2006 23:29:54 UTC 16 Jun 2006 15:04:45 UTC Over Success Done 14,181.53 55.81 55.81
                                      179254 159529 15 Jun 2006 11:09:29 UTC 16 Jun 2006 11:14:50 UTC Over Success Done 14,375.77 56.57 56.57
                                      178840 159127 15 Jun 2006 7:36:07 UTC 16 Jun 2006 8:41:29 UTC Over Success Done 14,242.95 56.05 56.05
                                      178558 158860 15 Jun 2006 4:15:02 UTC 15 Jun 2006 23:29:54 UTC Over Success Done 13,769.56 54.19 54.19
                                      178127 158438 14 Jun 2006 23:29:32 UTC 15 Jun 2006 20:00:12 UTC Over Success Done 14,343.39 56.44 56.44

                                      I\'ve set the other projects back to \"allow new work\" and \"resumed\" them. THanks for fixing this

                                      Profile Carlos_Pfitzner
                                      Avatar

                                      Joined: Feb 16 06
                                      Posts: 182
                                      ID: 296
                                      Credit: 22,792
                                      RAC: 0
                                      Message 1835 - Posted 17 Jun 2006 20:10:13 UTC - in response to Message 1821.

                                        Last modified: 17 Jun 2006 20:37:25 UTC

                                        1)I don\'t know if this was not mentioned early, but the progres counting don\'t work well.
                                        6 min ... 1.020%
                                        24 min ... 1.041% (8:21:56 to completion)
                                        40 min ... 1.042% (8:38:22 to completion)
                                        1:09:30 ... completion
                                        (I saw this also with 5.22)

                                        2)More memory need?
                                        12/06/2006 09:42:53|ralph@home|Message from server: Your computer has only 402116608 bytes of memory; workunit requires 97883392 more bytes


                                        I think there is no need for more momory -:)
                                        Jobs are finishing OK, w/o any errors, in normal run time !

                                        What is need is to \"fix\" this misleading message on both: (ralph and rosetta)

                                        ps: I had sucessfully run rosetta with 64 MB RAM
                                        *Only with that low ram I get about 70 page faults by second

                                        but I am getting above message on PCs with 256 MB physical RAM -:(

                                        Yeah !
                                        Really this %done indicator is not working smooth

                                        ps: on rosetta too,
                                        I had already aborted a WU by hand, cause this;I believed that it was stuck -:(
                                        It was with about 3 hours cpu time, at 1.00n%

                                        My preference run time is 2 hours, and boincview was prediting 190 hours
                                        of cpu time to completion -;

                                        ps: I really dont want to run a single job by 190 Hours :!:

                                        Thanks
                                        ____________
                                        Click signature for global team stats

                                        william

                                        Joined: Jun 3 06
                                        Posts: 4
                                        ID: 1466
                                        Credit: 74
                                        RAC: 0
                                        Message 1836 - Posted 17 Jun 2006 22:20:50 UTC - in response to Message 1835.

                                          1)I don\'t know if this was not mentioned early, but the progres counting don\'t work well.
                                          6 min ... 1.020%
                                          24 min ... 1.041% (8:21:56 to completion)
                                          40 min ... 1.042% (8:38:22 to completion)
                                          1:09:30 ... completion
                                          (I saw this also with 5.22)

                                          2)More memory need?
                                          12/06/2006 09:42:53|ralph@home|Message from server: Your computer has only 402116608 bytes of memory; workunit requires 97883392 more bytes


                                          I think there is no need for more momory -:)
                                          Jobs are finishing OK, w/o any errors, in normal run time !

                                          What is need is to \"fix\" this misleading message on both: (ralph and rosetta)

                                          ps: I had sucessfully run rosetta with 64 MB RAM
                                          *Only with that low ram I get about 70 page faults by second

                                          but I am getting above message on PCs with 256 MB physical RAM -:(

                                          Yeah !
                                          Really this %done indicator is not working smooth

                                          ps: on rosetta too,
                                          I had already aborted a WU by hand, cause this;I believed that it was stuck -:(
                                          It was with about 3 hours cpu time, at 1.00n%

                                          My preference run time is 2 hours, and boincview was prediting 190 hours
                                          of cpu time to completion -;

                                          ps: I really dont want to run a single job by 190 Hours :!:

                                          Thanks

                                          I think Ralph needs to work on the Progress bar area of the program. I went thur no problems, It was the first time I saw that from this project is all. so I thought I would say something but if that is normal then nothing to worry about.


                                          ____________

                                          Profile anders n

                                          Joined: Feb 16 06
                                          Posts: 166
                                          ID: 91
                                          Credit: 131,419
                                          RAC: 0
                                          Message 1838 - Posted 18 Jun 2006 8:10:52 UTC

                                            What happend here?

                                            http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=179470

                                            Runntime of 18600 sec on 7200 pref.

                                            Anders n
                                            ____________

                                            [B^S] suguruhirahara

                                            Joined: Mar 5 06
                                            Posts: 40
                                            ID: 992
                                            Credit: 6,001
                                            RAC: 0
                                            Message 1839 - Posted 18 Jun 2006 11:39:51 UTC

                                              Last modified: 18 Jun 2006 11:50:46 UTC

                                              An error happened in this result.
                                              http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=182521

                                              ...
                                              <message>
                                              - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)
                                              </message>
                                              ...


                                              I fear this happened after pc was back from suspend mode. but i\'m not very sure.

                                              {edit}
                                              Unhandled Exception Detected...

                                              - Unhandled Exception Record -
                                              Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x0061E868 read attempt to address 0xF8F3E75E


                                              ____________

                                              Profile Astro

                                              Joined: Feb 16 06
                                              Posts: 141
                                              ID: 48
                                              Credit: 32,977
                                              RAC: 0
                                              Message 1840 - Posted 18 Jun 2006 11:42:02 UTC - in response to Message 1838.

                                                Last modified: 18 Jun 2006 11:43:35 UTC


                                                [deleted]

                                                [B^S] suguruhirahara

                                                Joined: Mar 5 06
                                                Posts: 40
                                                ID: 992
                                                Credit: 6,001
                                                RAC: 0
                                                Message 1841 - Posted 18 Jun 2006 17:11:17 UTC

                                                  another one:
                                                  http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=182583

                                                  <stderr_txt>
                                                  # random seed: 2996939
                                                  # cpu_run_time_pref: 3600
                                                  # cpu_run_time_pref: 3600
                                                  # cpu_run_time_pref: 3600
                                                  ERROR:: Exit at: .\\dock_structure.cc line:401

                                                  </stderr_txt>

                                                  ____________

                                                  Rhiju
                                                  Forum moderator
                                                  Project developer
                                                  Project scientist

                                                  Joined: Feb 14 06
                                                  Posts: 161
                                                  ID: 4
                                                  Credit: 3,725
                                                  RAC: 0
                                                  Message 1843 - Posted 19 Jun 2006 3:29:36 UTC - in response to Message 1839.

                                                    Thanks, that\'s actually a very useful result for us, because the error triggered the display of a detailed stacktrace!

                                                    An error happened in this result.
                                                    http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=182521

                                                    ...
                                                    <message>
                                                    - exit code -1073741819 (0xc0000005)
                                                    </message>
                                                    ...


                                                    I fear this happened after pc was back from suspend mode. but i\'m not very sure.

                                                    {edit}
                                                    Unhandled Exception Detected...

                                                    - Unhandled Exception Record -
                                                    Reason: Access Violation (0xc0000005) at address 0x0061E868 read attempt to address 0xF8F3E75E



                                                    ____________

                                                    Profile anders n

                                                    Joined: Feb 16 06
                                                    Posts: 166
                                                    ID: 91
                                                    Credit: 131,419
                                                    RAC: 0
                                                    Message 1844 - Posted 19 Jun 2006 5:17:08 UTC

                                                      I got a error here.

                                                      http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=184229

                                                      Looks like the watch dog did it´s job.

                                                      <core_client_version>5.4.9</core_client_version>
                                                      <message>
                                                      Ett eller flera argument 䲠ogiltiga (0x80000003) - exit code -2147483645 (0x80000003)
                                                      </message>
                                                      <stderr_txt>
                                                      # random seed: 3013987
                                                      # cpu_run_time_pref: 7200
                                                      **********************************************************************
                                                      Rosetta score is stuck or going too long. Watchdog is ending the run!
                                                      CPU time: 30437.5 seconds. Greater than 4X preferred time: 7200 seconds
                                                      **********************************************************************


                                                      Anders n
                                                      ____________

                                                      Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.23


                                                      Home | Join | About | Participants | Community | Statistics

                                                      Copyright © 2017 University of Washington

                                                      Last Modified: 20 Nov 2008 19:41:56 UTC
                                                      Back to top ^