4.87 - result exceeds size limit

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : 4.87 - result exceeds size limit

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · Next

AuthorMessage
doc :)

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 46
Credit: 4,437
RAC: 0
Message 556 - Posted: 24 Feb 2006, 3:37:59 UTC
Last modified: 24 Feb 2006, 3:45:47 UTC

just finished my first 4.87 wu on my main pc:
24/02/2006 04:00:50|ralph@home|Computation for result BARCODE_30_1bm8__219_7_0 finished
24/02/2006 04:00:50|ralph@home|Output file BARCODE_30_1bm8__219_7_0_0 for result BARCODE_30_1bm8__219_7_0 exceeds size limit.
24/02/2006 04:00:50|ralph@home|File size: 39159730.000000 bytes. Limit: 25000000.000000 bytes
24/02/2006 04:00:51|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result BARCODE_30_1bm8__219_7_0 (<file_xfer_error> <file_name>BARCODE_30_1bm8__219_7_0_0</file_name> <error_code>-131</error_code> <error_message></error_message></file_xfer_error>)
24/02/2006 04:00:52|ralph@home|Started upload of BARCODE_30_1bm8__219_7_0_1
24/02/2006 04:00:58|ralph@home|Finished upload of BARCODE_30_1bm8__219_7_0_1
24/02/2006 04:00:58|ralph@home|Throughput 11314 bytes/sec


i had the graphics open, but was busy doing something else and cant answer if it reached the end or not, it was pretty close to the expected runtime last time i looked at it though. my other pc finished one 4.87 wu without problems, it took only barely over 1 hour instead of the target time of 2 (could be because of some long running model, remote machine, didnt look at graphics).
WU - result
ID: 556 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
doc :)

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 46
Credit: 4,437
RAC: 0
Message 557 - Posted: 24 Feb 2006, 5:26:47 UTC
Last modified: 24 Feb 2006, 5:29:15 UTC

cant edit my first post anymore, so heres a new one :)

looking at the wu page now it shows cancelled, and so do all other wus i got here on both pcs, all are of the same type/batch. got them all suspended right now, should i still crunch them while they all show cancelled under error on their pages?
ID: 557 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile dekim
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 20 Jan 06
Posts: 221
Credit: 527,409
RAC: 0
Message 562 - Posted: 24 Feb 2006, 8:16:54 UTC

If you see that they are cancelled, please abort them.
ID: 562 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
doc :)

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 46
Credit: 4,437
RAC: 0
Message 564 - Posted: 24 Feb 2006, 8:35:58 UTC

aborted all that showed cancelled on their pages, thx for your answer.
ID: 564 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
STE\/E

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 27
Credit: 2,206,576
RAC: 0
Message 565 - Posted: 24 Feb 2006, 10:36:05 UTC
Last modified: 24 Feb 2006, 10:37:45 UTC

I\'ve had a lot that showed canceled also, 70% - 80% failure rate so far. Something else I\'ve noticed with the v4.87 is that they don\'t like to Upload either.

Even if they finish successfully they will sit on my Pc\'s for hours doing nothing, it\'s like they are not even trying to Upload. If I try to Manually Upload them I get the same results, no message shows up that they will Retry or anything ... ???
ID: 565 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
STE\/E

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 27
Credit: 2,206,576
RAC: 0
Message 572 - Posted: 24 Feb 2006, 14:11:33 UTC
Last modified: 24 Feb 2006, 14:27:11 UTC

The WU\'s that I said were not Uploading have all finally Uploaded. It only took them close to 8 hr\'s to it though. This was a problem on all my PC\'s, the other Projects that I am running had no problem Uploading their WU\'s right after finishing a WU.

Maybe it\'s just something on the Server side ... ???

I ended up Aborting 48 WU\'s that showed Canceled already in the WU ID Pages & had 42 WU\'s that Erred out after Completing Successfully. From my Results Pages it looks like only about 25 give or take a few out of the 115 of the v4.87 WU\'s that I got actually Completed & Reported successfully ...
ID: 572 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
KB7RZF

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 7
Credit: 1,426
RAC: 0
Message 577 - Posted: 24 Feb 2006, 15:18:22 UTC
Last modified: 24 Feb 2006, 15:23:13 UTC

I had one that didn\'t show cancelled, but got the same message:

2/24/2006 5:48:34 AM|ralph@home|Output file BARCODE_30_1c9oA_219_24_0_0 for result BARCODE_30_1c9oA_219_24_0 exceeds size limit.
2/24/2006 5:48:34 AM|ralph@home|File size: 47170282.000000 bytes. Limit: 25000000.000000 bytes
2/24/2006 5:48:35 AM|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result BARCODE_30_1c9oA_219_24_0 (<file_xfer_error> <file_name>BARCODE_30_1c9oA_219_24_0_0</file_name> <error_code>-131</error_code> <error_message></error_message></file_xfer_error>)

But mine uploaded and reported. And I have the Target CPU run time set to 2 hours also. Dunno if it helps. :-)

Jeremy

[edit] Ok, I lied, found out it was cancelled. :-) Aborted the other 2 also that showed cancelled now. So nevermind.
ID: 577 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Aglarond

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 11
Credit: 1,094
RAC: 0
Message 580 - Posted: 24 Feb 2006, 16:13:20 UTC

Hi, I\'ve got the same message with result ID = 8090:
24. 2. 2006 13:43:17|ralph@home|Restarting result BARCODE_30_1fna__219_21_0 using rosetta_beta version 487
24. 2. 2006 14:16:53||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
24. 2. 2006 14:16:53|ralph@home|Computation for result BARCODE_30_1fna__219_21_0 finished
24. 2. 2006 14:16:53|ralph@home|Output file BARCODE_30_1fna__219_21_0_0 for result BARCODE_30_1fna__219_21_0 exceeds size limit.
24. 2. 2006 14:16:53|ralph@home|File size: 163498460.000000 bytes. Limit: 25000000.000000 bytes
24. 2. 2006 14:16:54|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result BARCODE_30_1fna__219_21_0 (<file_xfer_error> <file_name>BARCODE_30_1fna__219_21_0_0</file_name> <error_code>-131</error_code> <error_message></error_message></file_xfer_error>)
24. 2. 2006 14:16:55|ralph@home|Started upload of BARCODE_30_1fna__219_21_0_1
24. 2. 2006 14:17:03|ralph@home|Finished upload of BARCODE_30_1fna__219_21_0_1
24. 2. 2006 14:17:03|ralph@home|Throughput 34639 bytes/sec


But my WU is not cancelled, but shows
Outcome = Client error
Client state = Computing

I hope it helps..
ID: 580 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile napolj2

Send message
Joined: 20 Feb 06
Posts: 3
Credit: 293,823
RAC: 0
Message 583 - Posted: 24 Feb 2006, 21:27:57 UTC

I got the same error message:

2006-02-24 7:56:11 AM|ralph@home|Computation for result BARCODE_30_1acf__219_10_0 finished
2006-02-24 7:56:11 AM|ralph@home|Output file BARCODE_30_1acf__219_10_0_0 for result BARCODE_30_1acf__219_10_0 exceeds size limit.
2006-02-24 7:56:11 AM|ralph@home|File size: 59286690.000000 bytes. Limit: 25000000.000000 bytes
2006-02-24 7:56:11 AM|ralph@home|Starting result BARCODE_30_1elwA_215_49_1 using rosetta_beta version 487
2006-02-24 7:56:12 AM|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result BARCODE_30_1acf__219_10_0 (<file_xfer_error> <file_name>BARCODE_30_1acf__219_10_0_0</file_name> <error_code>-131</error_code> <error_message></error_message></file_xfer_error>)
2006-02-24 7:56:13 AM|ralph@home|Started upload of BARCODE_30_1acf__219_10_0_1
2006-02-24 7:56:18 AM|ralph@home|Finished upload of BARCODE_30_1acf__219_10_0_1

Result
Workunit

I had BOINC running as a service so I didn\'t see any of the graphics.

Since I\'m new to RALPH@Home, I had a question. The FAQ says that \"If you have a work unit that fails, it is important to report any imformation you have about the failure in the appropreate RALPH@home forum.\" So, I am supposed to make a post to the forum (presumably in the \'bug list\' section) for every single failure? Isn\'t all the information automatically reported by BOINC to the RALPH@Home server? What additional info am I supposed to report?
ID: 583 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Divide Overflow

Send message
Joined: 15 Feb 06
Posts: 12
Credit: 128,027
RAC: 0
Message 587 - Posted: 24 Feb 2006, 21:54:32 UTC
Last modified: 24 Feb 2006, 22:03:32 UTC

I\'m getting the same error on a few of my results as well:

http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=7947
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=7921
http://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=7903


2/24/2006 12:50:07 PM|ralph@home|Computation for result BARCODE_30_1elwA_219_15_0 finished
2/24/2006 12:50:07 PM|ralph@home|Output file BARCODE_30_1elwA_219_15_0_0 for result BARCODE_30_1elwA_219_15_0 exceeds size limit.
2/24/2006 12:50:07 PM|ralph@home|File size: 64445797.000000 bytes. Limit: 25000000.000000 bytes
2/24/2006 12:50:08 PM|ralph@home|Starting result BARCODE_30_1enh__219_15_0 using rosetta_beta version 487
2/24/2006 12:50:09 PM|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result BARCODE_30_1elwA_219_15_0 (<file_xfer_error> <file_name>BARCODE_30_1elwA_219_15_0_0</file_name> <error_code>-131</error_code> <error_message></error_message></file_xfer_error>)




ID: 587 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
doc :)

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 46
Credit: 4,437
RAC: 0
Message 589 - Posted: 24 Feb 2006, 22:05:53 UTC

had one more of these, this time the wu was from a older batch that was reissued twice before i got it (errored out with a older beta and different errors than the size limit thing before though)
WU - result


24/02/2006 14:42:43|ralph@home|Computation for result BARCODE_30_1c8cA_215_43_2 finished
24/02/2006 14:42:43|ralph@home|Output file BARCODE_30_1c8cA_215_43_2_0 for result BARCODE_30_1c8cA_215_43_2 exceeds size limit.
24/02/2006 14:42:43|ralph@home|File size: 45546511.000000 bytes. Limit: 25000000.000000 bytes
24/02/2006 14:42:45|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result BARCODE_30_1c8cA_215_43_2 (<file_xfer_error> <file_name>BARCODE_30_1c8cA_215_43_2_0</file_name> <error_code>-131</error_code> <error_message></error_message></file_xfer_error>)
24/02/2006 14:42:46|ralph@home|Started upload of BARCODE_30_1c8cA_215_43_2_1
24/02/2006 14:42:54|ralph@home|Finished upload of BARCODE_30_1c8cA_215_43_2_1
24/02/2006 14:42:54|ralph@home|Throughput 7915 bytes/sec

on reporting the result i got a further error:
24/02/2006 23:12:26|ralph@home|Couldn\'t delete file projects/ralph.bakerlab.org/BARCODE_30_1c8cA_215_43_2_0
i still got the file here, its more than 40mb big.
ID: 589 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
[B^S] sTrey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Feb 06
Posts: 58
Credit: 15,430
RAC: 0
Message 613 - Posted: 25 Feb 2006, 8:14:31 UTC

Old news I guess, but here are two more; wu/resultids are 7138/7794 and 7136/7792. These show as invalid [contributing to my currently used-up quota :( ]

These finished apparently normally, only getting the error on the upload.
ID: 613 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Astro

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 141
Credit: 32,977
RAC: 0
Message 622 - Posted: 25 Feb 2006, 14:07:22 UTC

Oops, I had one of these too, should have posted it here, but I posted it in the \"unclassified\" bug thread.
ID: 622 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Brian B

Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 06
Posts: 9
Credit: 2,632
RAC: 0
Message 642 - Posted: 25 Feb 2006, 17:40:15 UTC

Here\'s mine:

02/25/2006 11:04:26 AM|ralph@home|Computation for result BARCODE_30_4ubpA_219_2_0 finished
02/25/2006 11:04:26 AM|ralph@home|Output file BARCODE_30_4ubpA_219_2_0_0 for result BARCODE_30_4ubpA_219_2_0 exceeds size limit.
02/25/2006 11:04:26 AM|ralph@home|File size: 30720726.000000 bytes. Limit: 25000000.000000 bytes
02/25/2006 11:04:27 AM|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result BARCODE_30_4ubpA_219_2_0 (<file_xfer_error> <file_name>BARCODE_30_4ubpA_219_2_0_0</file_name> <error_code>-131</error_code> <error_message></error_message></file_xfer_error>)
02/25/2006 11:04:28 AM|ralph@home|Started upload of BARCODE_30_4ubpA_219_2_0_1
02/25/2006 11:04:35 AM|ralph@home|Finished upload of BARCODE_30_4ubpA_219_2_0_1
02/25/2006 11:04:35 AM|ralph@home|Throughput 12687 bytes/sec

Running v4.87
Result ID 7516
Workunit ID 6860
Server state = Over
Outcome = Client error
Client state = Computing
Target CPU = 2 hours

Hope this helps. Good Luck!
ID: 642 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Divide Overflow

Send message
Joined: 15 Feb 06
Posts: 12
Credit: 128,027
RAC: 0
Message 643 - Posted: 25 Feb 2006, 17:47:20 UTC
Last modified: 25 Feb 2006, 17:47:53 UTC

Almost all of my 4.87 WU\'s are producing this error now. Should we abort 4.87 work now that 4.89 (Windows) application is out?
ID: 643 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
doc :)

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 46
Credit: 4,437
RAC: 0
Message 645 - Posted: 25 Feb 2006, 18:16:12 UTC

well, bad news i think, the result exceeds size limit stuff is still there with 4.89, at least my last wu ended with that again.
WU - result

25/02/2006 19:19:01|ralph@home|Computation for result BARCODE_30_1ubi__215_41_2 finished
25/02/2006 19:19:01|ralph@home|Output file BARCODE_30_1ubi__215_41_2_0 for result BARCODE_30_1ubi__215_41_2 exceeds size limit.
25/02/2006 19:19:01|ralph@home|File size: 27694002.000000 bytes. Limit: 25000000.000000 bytes
25/02/2006 19:19:02|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result BARCODE_30_1ubi__215_41_2 (<file_xfer_error> <file_name>BARCODE_30_1ubi__215_41_2_0</file_name> <error_code>-131</error_code> <error_message></error_message></file_xfer_error>)
ID: 645 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Colin Porter

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 3
Credit: 24
RAC: 0
Message 658 - Posted: 25 Feb 2006, 22:16:14 UTC
Last modified: 25 Feb 2006, 22:27:21 UTC

Unfortunately I\'ve had it happen as well with 4.89. At least the problem with
\"Leave applications in memory while preempted\" Seems to be sorted, (edit)Iv\'e had three WU\'s succeed today running 4.89 so this may just be a problem with this particular WU.
My Results
(end edit)

25/02/2006 20:31:11|ralph@home|Pausing result BARCODE_30_1pgx__215_36_1 (removed from memory)
25/02/2006 20:31:13||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
25/02/2006 20:31:26||Resuming computation and network activity
25/02/2006 20:31:26||request_reschedule_cpus: Resuming activities
25/02/2006 20:31:26|ralph@home|Restarting result BARCODE_30_1pgx__215_36_1 using rosetta_beta version 489
25/02/2006 21:31:27|SETI@home|Restarting result 09fe01aa.135.10161.129826.1.89_3 using setiathome version 418
25/02/2006 21:31:27|ralph@home|Pausing result BARCODE_30_1pgx__215_36_1 (removed from memory)
25/02/2006 21:31:28|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result BARCODE_30_1pgx__215_36_1 ( - exit code -164 (0xffffff5c))
25/02/2006 21:31:28||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
25/02/2006 21:31:28|ralph@home|Computation for result BARCODE_30_1pgx__215_36_1 finished
25/02/2006 21:31:28|ralph@home|Output file BARCODE_30_1pgx__215_36_1_0 for result BARCODE_30_1pgx__215_36_1 exceeds size limit.
25/02/2006 21:31:28|ralph@home|File size: 35555962.000000 bytes. Limit: 25000000.000000 bytes
ID: 658 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
hugothehermit

Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 06
Posts: 17
Credit: 2,170
RAC: 0
Message 663 - Posted: 25 Feb 2006, 23:38:01 UTC
Last modified: 25 Feb 2006, 23:45:11 UTC

Add my name to the list :)

26/02/2006 8:09:26 AM|ralph@home|Aborting result BARCODE_30_1bm8__221_10_0: exceeded disk limit: 200247907.000000 > 200000000.000000
26/02/2006 8:09:26 AM|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result BARCODE_30_1bm8__221_10_0 (Maximum disk usage exceeded)
ver 4.88



Edit: to clean up
ID: 663 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
hugothehermit

Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 06
Posts: 17
Credit: 2,170
RAC: 0
Message 688 - Posted: 26 Feb 2006, 22:34:59 UTC

I got another, I had a look at the slots n \\stdout.txt and found it to be 80,562KB and full of
WARNING:: fullatom scorefxn terms requested
but fullatom flag is false
fullatom terms will not be evaluated

error messages.

Maybe your making the stdout file(s) too big and causing the BOINC disk space to be used up?
ID: 688 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
[B^S] sTrey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Feb 06
Posts: 58
Credit: 15,430
RAC: 0
Message 723 - Posted: 28 Feb 2006, 5:51:56 UTC

Yes still happening with 4.89, the output file exceeds limit message is in the client output file, the -131 error in the result file. Most recent for me is result 11865
cpu pref set to 2 hours, quits very close to that time.
ID: 723 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
1 · 2 · Next

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : 4.87 - result exceeds size limit



©2018 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org