Bug reports for Ralph 5.37 through 5.40

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.37 through 5.40

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next

AuthorMessage
Wiesi

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 06
Posts: 3
Credit: 397
RAC: 0
Message 2517 - Posted: 9 Nov 2006, 11:56:05 UTC - in response to Message 2516.  

http://img146.imageshack.us/my.php?image=rosettasu7.gif

Is this alright?


I had the same on my current WU

FRA_t362_HOMOENV_CENRLXhom001_8_t362_6_1z54A_IGNORE_THE_REST_266_1369_8_0 using rosetta version 536

with normal rosetta not ralph
ID: 2517 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile feet1st

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 06
Posts: 313
Credit: 116,623
RAC: 0
Message 2520 - Posted: 9 Nov 2006, 16:45:36 UTC

Itay / Wiesi: Both of you are reporting V5.36, where there are detached segments floating off the backbone of the native structure. Have you seen this on the higher versions? I think they've fixed that one.
ID: 2520 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Wiesi

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 06
Posts: 3
Credit: 397
RAC: 0
Message 2522 - Posted: 9 Nov 2006, 18:49:24 UTC

the current version for rosetta@home is V5.36

if you mean if I have seen it on ralph 5.40 or so then nope ...
that was the first time i saw that
ID: 2522 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile sslickerson

Send message
Joined: 15 Feb 06
Posts: 17
Credit: 4,006
RAC: 0
Message 2524 - Posted: 9 Nov 2006, 22:53:25 UTC

My computer just threw a runtime error by Microsoft Visual C++ for RALPH:

"This application (RALPH) has requested the Runtime to terminate it in an unusual way"

Do you need anything from me?

Tim


ID: 2524 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile sslickerson

Send message
Joined: 15 Feb 06
Posts: 17
Credit: 4,006
RAC: 0
Message 2525 - Posted: 9 Nov 2006, 22:56:16 UTC

Also just had a Computation Error.


ID: 2525 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
John Lewis Highsmith

Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 06
Posts: 7
Credit: 49,423
RAC: 0
Message 2526 - Posted: 9 Nov 2006, 23:24:12 UTC

I also had a C++ runtime error message and

11/9/2006 6:58:02 PM|ralph@home|Starting task FRA_t364_CASP7_hom001_1_IGNORE_THE_RESTt364_1_S_00001_0000005_0.pdb_1449_14_3 using rosetta_beta version 540

11/9/2006 7:12:35 PM|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result FRA_t364_CASP7_hom001_1_IGNORE_THE_RESTt364_1_S_00001_0000005_0.pdb_1449_14_3 (The system cannot find the path specified. (0x3) - exit code 3 (0x3))

11/9/2006 7:12:36 PM|ralph@home|Computation for task FRA_t364_CASP7_hom001_1_IGNORE_THE_RESTt364_1_S_00001_0000005_0.pdb_1449_14_3 finished

ID: 2526 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
casio7131

Send message
Joined: 20 Mar 06
Posts: 15
Credit: 12,660
RAC: 0
Message 2527 - Posted: 10 Nov 2006, 12:15:09 UTC

i got some strange visual c++ runtime error about ralph wanting to shutdown unusually (didn't pay too much attention, sorry).
https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=323137
ID: 2527 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
casio7131

Send message
Joined: 20 Mar 06
Posts: 15
Credit: 12,660
RAC: 0
Message 2528 - Posted: 10 Nov 2006, 12:17:31 UTC
Last modified: 10 Nov 2006, 13:04:26 UTC

sorry, double post
ID: 2528 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Trog Dog
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Aug 06
Posts: 38
Credit: 41,996
RAC: 0
Message 2529 - Posted: 10 Nov 2006, 16:02:43 UTC

Only one bad 5.40 wu to report so far.
ID: 2529 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile [B^S] JoeB@Ky

Send message
Joined: 11 Oct 06
Posts: 8
Credit: 39,098
RAC: 0
Message 2530 - Posted: 11 Nov 2006, 3:27:52 UTC

I'm currently running a beta 5.40 file and it is running the same as the last 3-4 versions:

A) Only shows a progress of 1.000% until finished.
B) Only counts up for time remaining until completion.
ID: 2530 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile anders n

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 166
Credit: 131,419
RAC: 0
Message 2532 - Posted: 11 Nov 2006, 14:28:57 UTC

The grafics on this WU is not in the "boxes" for the first

30000 steps or so.

https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=324350

Anders n
ID: 2532 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile anders n

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 166
Credit: 131,419
RAC: 0
Message 2533 - Posted: 11 Nov 2006, 18:15:10 UTC - in response to Message 2532.  

The grafics on this WU is not in the "boxes" for the first

30000 steps or so.

https://ralph.bakerlab.org/result.php?resultid=324350

Anders n



Update

It is only when it starts an even Model number ex 2,12,50.

Anders n


ID: 2533 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
dexmon

Send message
Joined: 14 Nov 06
Posts: 1
Credit: 197
RAC: 0
Message 2538 - Posted: 16 Nov 2006, 16:49:29 UTC

FRA_2rio_RIO2_hom002_6_2rio_6_1a06__IGNORE_THE_REST_10_1499_12_0


WARNING! error deleting file .aa2rio.out
ID: 2538 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Chu
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 26 Sep 06
Posts: 61
Credit: 12,545
RAC: 0
Message 2539 - Posted: 16 Nov 2006, 23:26:00 UTC - in response to Message 2538.  

We finally got time tracking down this harmless but confusing "warning" output. It is due to a problem of not closing a file stream properly after opening it. The fix will be included in the next update.
FRA_2rio_RIO2_hom002_6_2rio_6_1a06__IGNORE_THE_REST_10_1499_12_0


WARNING! error deleting file .aa2rio.out

ID: 2539 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Pepo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 06
Posts: 104
Credit: 36,890
RAC: 0
Message 2540 - Posted: 17 Nov 2006, 12:24:16 UTC
Last modified: 17 Nov 2006, 13:11:00 UTC

Pepo wrote:
Also the version 5.36 is checkpointing after reaching 100% (instead of reporting the result) and then being preempted by other apps afterwards (possibly for a longer time, because of negative STD).

Also the version 5.40 is checkpointing after reaching 100% (instead of reporting the result) and then being preempted by other apps afterwards (possibly for a longer time, if there is too negative STD).

Actually it happened on Rosetta, not here, but I assume the responsible code is the same.

Peter
ID: 2540 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Krzychu P.

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 19
Credit: 25,687
RAC: 0
Message 2548 - Posted: 21 Nov 2006, 7:17:28 UTC

I get before a moment:

2006-11-21 09:18:03|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result 1agr_1_NMRREF_1_1agr_1_idid_model_09_0001IGNORE_THE_REST_idl_1507_27_0 (Niepoprawna funkcja. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))


<core_client_version>5.6.5</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
Niepoprawna funkcja. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# random seed: 2848069
sin_cos_range ERROR: -1.#IND000 is outside of [-1,+1] range
sin_cos_range ERROR: -1.#IND000 is outside of [-1,+1] range
ABORT: bad to aa_rotno_to_packedrotno
aa,rot1/2/3/4: LEU 10 3 0 0 0
chi no 2 nchi 2 aav 1 is_chi_proton_rotamer(aa,aav,i) 0
ERROR:: Exit at: .rotamer_functions.cc line:1509
ID: 2548 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Krzychu P.

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 19
Credit: 25,687
RAC: 0
Message 2552 - Posted: 23 Nov 2006, 10:11:44 UTC

One more:

2006-11-23 12:14:34|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result CAPRI_11_U1H2_GLOBAL_DOCKING_1510_39_2 (Niepoprawna funkcja. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))

<core_client_version>5.6.5</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
Niepoprawna funkcja. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
ERROR:: Exit at: .docking.cc line:1825

Even it didn't begin to compute :(

ID: 2552 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Chu
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 26 Sep 06
Posts: 61
Credit: 12,545
RAC: 0
Message 2553 - Posted: 23 Nov 2006, 16:14:52 UTC - in response to Message 2540.  

that has been fixed in current Rosetta code repository and will be included in the next ralph release.
Pepo wrote:
Also the version 5.36 is checkpointing after reaching 100% (instead of reporting the result) and then being preempted by other apps afterwards (possibly for a longer time, because of negative STD).

Also the version 5.40 is checkpointing after reaching 100% (instead of reporting the result) and then being preempted by other apps afterwards (possibly for a longer time, if there is too negative STD).

Actually it happened on Rosetta, not here, but I assume the responsible code is the same.

Peter

ID: 2553 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Chu
Volunteer moderator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 26 Sep 06
Posts: 61
Credit: 12,545
RAC: 0
Message 2554 - Posted: 23 Nov 2006, 16:16:58 UTC - in response to Message 2552.  

Thanks. that WU is problematic.
One more:

2006-11-23 12:14:34|ralph@home|Unrecoverable error for result CAPRI_11_U1H2_GLOBAL_DOCKING_1510_39_2 (Niepoprawna funkcja. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))

5.6.5

Niepoprawna funkcja. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)


ERROR:: Exit at: .docking.cc line:1825

Even it didn't begin to compute :(

ID: 2554 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Pieface

Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 06
Posts: 64
Credit: 203,513
RAC: 0
Message 2555 - Posted: 23 Nov 2006, 19:25:23 UTC

Here's another one of those capri_i1 guys, same error:

resid 330118

'' ERROR:: Exit at: .docking.cc line:1825 ''
ID: 2555 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next

Message boards : RALPH@home bug list : Bug reports for Ralph 5.37 through 5.40



©2021 University of Washington
http://www.bakerlab.org